Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Frank Underwood" data-source="post: 426786" data-attributes="member: 35">That happened early on, so it was easier for me to accept it.Garrison didn&#039;t want to be found, and it was probably easier to go into hiding back then before everybody had a digital footprint.&nbsp; I understand where she was coming from, but I think she was misguided.&nbsp; It was JR&#039;s family home, Jock&#039;s money saved it, but Miss Ellie didn&#039;t like getting the ranch by default.&nbsp; I still like the character of Miss Ellie, although I don&#039;t always agree with her.&nbsp; I think Garrison deserved to forfeit his right to the ranch after letting the family think he was dead.Yes, good point.&nbsp; I thought it was odd that Jenna&#039;s remark turned out to be such a throwaway line.&nbsp; It seemed like it was leading up to Jamie being dubious.Yes, and you can poke holes in most fictional narratives if you try hard enough.&nbsp; Of course, one can generally look past that if the execution is done properly.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Frank Underwood, post: 426786, member: 35"] That happened early on, so it was easier for me to accept it. Garrison didn't want to be found, and it was probably easier to go into hiding back then before everybody had a digital footprint. I understand where she was coming from, but I think she was misguided. It was JR's family home, Jock's money saved it, but Miss Ellie didn't like getting the ranch by default. I still like the character of Miss Ellie, although I don't always agree with her. I think Garrison deserved to forfeit his right to the ranch after letting the family think he was dead. Yes, good point. I thought it was odd that Jenna's remark turned out to be such a throwaway line. It seemed like it was leading up to Jamie being dubious. Yes, and you can poke holes in most fictional narratives if you try hard enough. Of course, one can generally look past that if the execution is done properly. [/QUOTE]

Verification

6 + 4 =