Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Entertainment
Screen Icons
Bette Davis vs. Joan Crawford
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ClassyCo" data-source="post: 233935" data-attributes="member: 7"><p><span style="font-family: 'arial'">I've been watching <em>Joan Crawford: The Ultimate Movie Star</em>, the very good TCM documentary that's been released as a special feature on the DVD of <em>Mildred Pierce</em>. </span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial'">During Joan's post-Warner Brothers days, she reinvented herself yet again. She was graciously invited back to MGM to star in the 1953 musical drama <em>Torch Song</em>, which she had been led to believe was going to be a "major" picture. Of course, it scatted over to B-movie territory, was derided by critics, flopped at the box office, but yet remains a cult favorite among Crawford's fans for its total outrageousness. </span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial'">Anyway, the point I'm getting is Joan's "new look" she came up with (I'm guessing) to distant herself from Warner Brothers. Her hair was bobbed and lightened giving her an appearance the aforementioned documentary calls "terrifying". A theory given is Joan was creating a "warrior" exterior with a "nobody can touch me" attitude. Her daughter Christina said her adopted mother's developed a toughness that never left. </span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial'">Her face did change sometime in the early 1950s. She looked tougher, meaner, and not nearly as attractive as she had been before. </span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'arial'">Your thoughts? </span></p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]21865[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]21866[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ClassyCo, post: 233935, member: 7"] [FONT=arial]I've been watching [I]Joan Crawford: The Ultimate Movie Star[/I], the very good TCM documentary that's been released as a special feature on the DVD of [I]Mildred Pierce[/I]. During Joan's post-Warner Brothers days, she reinvented herself yet again. She was graciously invited back to MGM to star in the 1953 musical drama [I]Torch Song[/I], which she had been led to believe was going to be a "major" picture. Of course, it scatted over to B-movie territory, was derided by critics, flopped at the box office, but yet remains a cult favorite among Crawford's fans for its total outrageousness. Anyway, the point I'm getting is Joan's "new look" she came up with (I'm guessing) to distant herself from Warner Brothers. Her hair was bobbed and lightened giving her an appearance the aforementioned documentary calls "terrifying". A theory given is Joan was creating a "warrior" exterior with a "nobody can touch me" attitude. Her daughter Christina said her adopted mother's developed a toughness that never left. Her face did change sometime in the early 1950s. She looked tougher, meaner, and not nearly as attractive as she had been before. Your thoughts? [/FONT] [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" width="327px" alt="1597761700824.png"]21865[/ATTACH][ATTACH type="full" width="325px" alt="1597761722091.png"]21866[/ATTACH][/CENTER] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What month follows July?
Post reply
Forums
Entertainment
Screen Icons
Bette Davis vs. Joan Crawford
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top