Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
US Soaps
Contemporary US Drama
Discussions and stuff
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Willie Oleson" data-source="post: 314923" data-attributes="member: 8"><p>Interesting comment about money vs. production values. If it's true that DALLAS had to do with a smaller budget than YELLOWSTONE then I think DALLAS actually did a better job, fake Southfork notwithstanding. They've done lots of beautiful outdoors scenes (or even complete episodes) and you know, a prairie is a prairie and a tree is a tree and there isn't anything in YELLOWSTONE that I haven't seen in DALLAS. </p><p>And how about the spectacular scenery in THE YELLOW ROSE, that also happened in the 1980s.</p><p></p><p>Of course the 80s soap genre was a lot about barging into/storming out of offices and mansions, sometimes entertainingly hindered by an evil staircase, and like I said</p><p></p><p>Beautiful wide shots in wide screen isn't enough to make interesting drama.</p><p></p><p>But what actually disturbs me about that article is that it took me a while to recollect the Who Shot J.D.? scene. There isn't much about this series that lingers on and unfortunately my two favourite characters didn't fare well in the story - one was killed off early on and the other one keeps disappearing in the background just when things start to get interesting.</p><p>The cliff hanger is violent but not nearly as exciting as Angelica Nero's revenge or the explosion on Christopher Ewing's alternative energy rig or the execution of Drew Ramos or even the off-screen <em>fake</em> execution of Emma Ryland.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Willie Oleson, post: 314923, member: 8"] Interesting comment about money vs. production values. If it's true that DALLAS had to do with a smaller budget than YELLOWSTONE then I think DALLAS actually did a better job, fake Southfork notwithstanding. They've done lots of beautiful outdoors scenes (or even complete episodes) and you know, a prairie is a prairie and a tree is a tree and there isn't anything in YELLOWSTONE that I haven't seen in DALLAS. And how about the spectacular scenery in THE YELLOW ROSE, that also happened in the 1980s. Of course the 80s soap genre was a lot about barging into/storming out of offices and mansions, sometimes entertainingly hindered by an evil staircase, and like I said Beautiful wide shots in wide screen isn't enough to make interesting drama. But what actually disturbs me about that article is that it took me a while to recollect the Who Shot J.D.? scene. There isn't much about this series that lingers on and unfortunately my two favourite characters didn't fare well in the story - one was killed off early on and the other one keeps disappearing in the background just when things start to get interesting. The cliff hanger is violent but not nearly as exciting as Angelica Nero's revenge or the explosion on Christopher Ewing's alternative energy rig or the execution of Drew Ramos or even the off-screen [I]fake[/I] execution of Emma Ryland. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What month follows July?
Post reply
Forums
US Soaps
Contemporary US Drama
Discussions and stuff
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top