The forum is about to undergo some crucial server updates

There may be a little downtime, but we'll be back online as soon as possible.

Watch this thread for updates

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Frankenstein Underworld" data-source="post: 157314" data-attributes="member: 35">What does making a show exciting have to do with maintaining continuity?  Come on, that's just excusing laziness.  She promised to preserve the show's history and failed to deliver.And if her idea of "exciting" was doing the type of storylines you'd see on Breaking Bad, 24, CSI, and Law and Order, then maybe she should have helmed one of those shows instead.  She was an interloper who pushed the creator of the show out, and who demonstrated she had no interest in the source material.  It shouldn't be a "tough dilemma" to do a continuation of a show that feels like a legitimate extension of that show, rather than a crime drama/telenovela.  Your sarcasm seems to stem from not everybody being in love with the show like you are.You want to have your cake and eat it too.  You say fans can't pick and choose what's canon, but you applaud Cidre for doing the same damn thing.So true.  Most of her storylines had been done immensely better on other shows.  Pitty she wanted to do every type of show except Dallas, and even failed at that.</blockquote>