Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jock Ewing Fan" data-source="post: 429305" data-attributes="member: 40536">Kosovo - NATO is led by the US, and there would have been no intervention without the uSKosovo - NATO is led by the US and there would have been no intervention without the USAnd I thought you didn&#039;t want to fund NATO&quot;Was that when the US threatened to annex Greenland from Belgium or annex Canada??Bottom line is the US takes all of the credit and never any blame.&quot;Credit /Blame fir what?I think it was Denmark actually, and it was clearly not to be taken seriously, and it has nothing to do with this thread,or anything I saidCanada benefits far more from the US than vice versa.&nbsp; That is not demeaning Canada, that is just realityI could name the benefits all day and all month, but it wouldn&#039;t make a difference, since you just don&#039;t care about anything other than your narrative.And again, America is the reason that Canada is a free country, because Canada receives the benefit of the American Defense.And Canada needs the US, no matter what you think&quot;This forum is owned by a European last I knew. If it were owned by an American it would likely be forced offline in these radical, anti free speech times being implemented by the US government.The government FCC chair regulates business mergers and is threatening those mergers by blackmailing them into capitulation to TACO. If you&#039;re okay with that you likely never listened to Charlie Kirk as a fan.&#039;You are creating a straw man. The First Amendment prevents the government from enacting certain laws against free speech.&nbsp; Forums that are not government owned are not subject to the same.&nbsp; I am guessing you had no issues when another major social media posts was banning right leaning posts, based on pressure from people who share your agenda.&nbsp; And there are always multiple complications with mergers that the public doesn&#039;t even know aboutAnd you didn&#039;t answer why the leaders of other countries did not agree to support the President to bring about change to Russia.You want the US to do the heavy lifting when it suits you, but otherwise, you just villify the US and the American people ( at least the ones who don&#039;t agree with you&quot;And again, this thread is about the Kirks.&nbsp; Please return to topic</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jock Ewing Fan, post: 429305, member: 40536"] Kosovo - NATO is led by the US, and there would have been no intervention without the uS Kosovo - NATO is led by the US and there would have been no intervention without the US And I thought you didn't want to fund NATO "Was that when the US threatened to annex Greenland from Belgium or annex Canada?? Bottom line is the US takes all of the credit and never any blame." Credit /Blame fir what? I think it was Denmark actually, and it was clearly not to be taken seriously, and it has nothing to do with this thread, or anything I said Canada benefits far more from the US than vice versa. That is not demeaning Canada, that is just reality I could name the benefits all day and all month, but it wouldn't make a difference, since you just don't care about anything other than your narrative. And again, America is the reason that Canada is a free country, because Canada receives the benefit of the American Defense. And Canada needs the US, no matter what you think "This forum is owned by a European last I knew. If it were owned by an American it would likely be forced offline in these radical, anti free speech times being implemented by the US government. The government FCC chair regulates business mergers and is threatening those mergers by blackmailing them into capitulation to TACO. If you're okay with that you likely never listened to Charlie Kirk as a fan.' You are creating a straw man. The First Amendment prevents the government from enacting certain laws against free speech. Forums that are not government owned are not subject to the same. I am guessing you had no issues when another major social media posts was banning right leaning posts, based on pressure from people who share your agenda. And there are always multiple complications with mergers that the public doesn't even know about And you didn't answer why the leaders of other countries did not agree to support the President to bring about change to Russia. You want the US to do the heavy lifting when it suits you, but otherwise, you just villify the US and the American people ( at least the ones who don't agree with you" And again, this thread is about the Kirks. Please return to topic [/QUOTE]

Verification

What month follows July?