Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Frank Underwood" data-source="post: 114856" data-attributes="member: 35">Well, it hasn&#039;t entirely been nothing.&nbsp; The charges against members of the Trump team over money laundering for Russian oligarchs is certainly valid, and some of them clearly perjured themselves.&nbsp; I also think it&#039;s likely that Trump is guilty of obstruction of justice due to his attempts to shut the investigation down.&nbsp; As for the collusion charge that initiated Russia-gate, it does indeed appear to be bogus.&nbsp; Or, at the very least, they are incapable of proving it conclusively.&nbsp; Mueller even said that Trump isn&#039;t a criminal target at this point.&nbsp; Many of the people who are certain Trump is guilty of collusion and thus treason ignore the fact that the Clintons also benefited from deals with Russian oligarchs.&nbsp; And as for the poster who mentioned Hillary&#039;s emails, she wasn&#039;t charged because Comey claimed she lacked &quot;criminal intent.&quot;&nbsp; In other words, the claim is that she didn&#039;t knowingly use her private email server to transmit classified information.&nbsp; At most, she was labeled &quot;sloppy, careless, and negligent&quot; for using a private server for government work because the potential to transmit classified information existed.&nbsp; Hillary supporters believe that was the right decision.&nbsp; I doubt they will come to the same conclusion if Trump isn&#039;t found guilty of colluding with Russia.It&#039;s all just partisan politics.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Frank Underwood, post: 114856, member: 35"] Well, it hasn't [I]entirely[/I] been nothing. The charges against members of the Trump team over money laundering for Russian oligarchs is certainly valid, and some of them clearly perjured themselves. I also think it's likely that Trump is guilty of obstruction of justice due to his attempts to shut the investigation down. As for the collusion charge that initiated Russia-gate, it does indeed appear to be bogus. Or, at the very least, they are incapable of proving it conclusively. Mueller even said that Trump isn't a criminal target at this point. Many of the people who are certain Trump is guilty of collusion and thus treason ignore the fact that the Clintons also benefited from deals with Russian oligarchs. And as for the poster who mentioned Hillary's emails, she wasn't charged because Comey claimed she lacked "criminal intent." In other words, the claim is that she didn't knowingly use her private email server to transmit classified information. At most, she was labeled "sloppy, careless, and negligent" for using a private server for government work because the potential to transmit classified information existed. Hillary supporters believe that was the right decision. I doubt they will come to the same conclusion if Trump isn't found guilty of colluding with Russia. It's all just partisan politics. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What month follows July?