Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Emelee" data-source="post: 22143" data-attributes="member: 73">YES! Absolutely just for the sake of it! 50 years ago, women were pretty much only baby-birthing objects. It&#039;d f&#039;ing important for women to rule big time. 44 men in a row -- and not because they were always better than any woman. We have the same situation in Sweden. No woman has been Prime Minister so far. It&#039;s been close a couple of times with Anna Lindh and Mona Sahlin (for the Social Democrats). One was killed and the other screwed up as party leader. There&#039;s an election in 2 years. The center-right alliance could very well win, and they have 3 female party leaders of the 4 parties in the alliance. The clearly biggest party in the alliance is Moderaterna, lead by Anna Kinberg Batra. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if she became Sweden&#039;s first female PM. --- I hate her party, but.... for the sake of feminism and women, I would be happy for that at least.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Emelee, post: 22143, member: 73"] YES! Absolutely just for the sake of it! 50 years ago, women were pretty much only baby-birthing objects. It'd f'ing important for women to rule big time. 44 men in a row -- and not because they were always better than any woman. We have the same situation in Sweden. No woman has been Prime Minister so far. It's been close a couple of times with Anna Lindh and Mona Sahlin (for the Social Democrats). One was killed and the other screwed up as party leader. There's an election in 2 years. The center-right alliance could very well win, and they have 3 female party leaders of the 4 parties in the alliance. The clearly biggest party in the alliance is Moderaterna, lead by Anna Kinberg Batra. I wouldn't be surprised if she became Sweden's first female PM. --- I hate her party, but.... for the sake of feminism and women, I would be happy for that at least. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Who played JR Ewing?