Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
Former Time Magazine Editor Admits He’s Pro-Propaganda, Refuses To Answer Panel Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frank Underwood" data-source="post: 121480" data-attributes="member: 35"><p>Yeah, Dore has opinions contrary to the Democratic establishment. That's why he's my favorite political commentator. He "doubts the credibility of intelligence agencies" because of failures going back to the WMDs lie that led to the Iraq War. He's also interviewed former intelligence agents who raise doubts about the agencies they worked for. He's reported on news outlets whose stories about Russia had to be retracted because they were false, he's discussed how we accuse countries of crimes without a proper investigation, and yes, he's called out war hawks in the Democratic Party. He also rails against injustices such as the people of Flint, Michigan having contaminated water and an economic system that has created record high income inequality. And yes, he goes after Democrats who claim to care about these people, but only give them lip service because they'd rather capitulate to their donors.</p><p></p><p>I'm assuming you're trying to say Dore himself is a propagandist, when he's really trying to get to the truth of what's going on in the world. It's ironic that the Washington Post called Dore "Sanders-obsessed," considering they ran sixteen anti-Sanders articles in a sixteen hour span back in 2016. But I guess it's okay to be "Sanders-obsessed" as long as you hate him.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frank Underwood, post: 121480, member: 35"] Yeah, Dore has opinions contrary to the Democratic establishment. That's why he's my favorite political commentator. He "doubts the credibility of intelligence agencies" because of failures going back to the WMDs lie that led to the Iraq War. He's also interviewed former intelligence agents who raise doubts about the agencies they worked for. He's reported on news outlets whose stories about Russia had to be retracted because they were false, he's discussed how we accuse countries of crimes without a proper investigation, and yes, he's called out war hawks in the Democratic Party. He also rails against injustices such as the people of Flint, Michigan having contaminated water and an economic system that has created record high income inequality. And yes, he goes after Democrats who claim to care about these people, but only give them lip service because they'd rather capitulate to their donors. I'm assuming you're trying to say Dore himself is a propagandist, when he's really trying to get to the truth of what's going on in the world. It's ironic that the Washington Post called Dore "Sanders-obsessed," considering they ran sixteen anti-Sanders articles in a sixteen hour span back in 2016. But I guess it's okay to be "Sanders-obsessed" as long as you hate him. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
6 + 4 =
Post reply
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
Former Time Magazine Editor Admits He’s Pro-Propaganda, Refuses To Answer Panel Question
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top