Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Entertainment
Movies
Grande Dame Guignol
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarky Oracle!" data-source="post: 54506" data-attributes="member: 57984"><p>BABY JANE and CHARLOTTE are sisters: they know each other very well.</p><p></p><p>Same director, writer, composer, acting troupe. So both movies have a ton in common, even structurally. Yes, BABY JANE was first. A lot of Crawford fans dismiss CHARLOTTE as "cheap rip-off" but I find CHARLOTTE to be the grander, more poignant film.</p><p></p><p>After Olivia DeHavilland replaced Joan, she brought a breezy contrast to Bette Davis, and it worked. Still, one wonders how much darker CHARLOTTE might have been had we seen La Crawford silently wandering the halls and moors of that Louisiana plantation at midnight in her huge choker necklaces and her period beehive Medusa hairdo. It might have been almost <em>too</em> dark in its back-of-a-dark-closet kind of way.</p><p></p><p><img src="https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/5d/45/50/5d4550c290a28735d3a099b44c6eb0c1.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p><img src="http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/87/9d/e2/879de257f303d9f3a9fe532d4f8f1761.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p><img src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RsigVSLnBQI/VwDyw1vyauI/AAAAAAAATwg/ILdVwGapdqMp9DICFbJ_Dhm-kS01lJz-A/s1600/Agnes-Moorehead-Joan-Crawford-Olivia-de-Havilland-Hush-Hush-Sweet-Charlotte-1964.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarky Oracle!, post: 54506, member: 57984"] BABY JANE and CHARLOTTE are sisters: they know each other very well. Same director, writer, composer, acting troupe. So both movies have a ton in common, even structurally. Yes, BABY JANE was first. A lot of Crawford fans dismiss CHARLOTTE as "cheap rip-off" but I find CHARLOTTE to be the grander, more poignant film. After Olivia DeHavilland replaced Joan, she brought a breezy contrast to Bette Davis, and it worked. Still, one wonders how much darker CHARLOTTE might have been had we seen La Crawford silently wandering the halls and moors of that Louisiana plantation at midnight in her huge choker necklaces and her period beehive Medusa hairdo. It might have been almost [I]too[/I] dark in its back-of-a-dark-closet kind of way. [IMG]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/5d/45/50/5d4550c290a28735d3a099b44c6eb0c1.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/87/9d/e2/879de257f303d9f3a9fe532d4f8f1761.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RsigVSLnBQI/VwDyw1vyauI/AAAAAAAATwg/ILdVwGapdqMp9DICFbJ_Dhm-kS01lJz-A/s1600/Agnes-Moorehead-Joan-Crawford-Olivia-de-Havilland-Hush-Hush-Sweet-Charlotte-1964.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who played Sue Ellen in Dallas?
Post reply
Forums
Entertainment
Movies
Grande Dame Guignol
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top