Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
News & Politics
Headline News
Homophobic bakers lose 'gay cake' appeal.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Willie Oleson" data-source="post: 17918" data-attributes="member: 8"><p>No-one should be allowed to discriminate anyone, and that's why we have the anti-discrimination law. I never contested that. But I was confused by your "they <em>shouldn't</em> be in business" comment. Because should/shouldn't is an optional situation. Illegal practice is not.</p><p>But I think we've sorted that part of the discussion.</p><p></p><p>I disagree. Refusing to fulfil a <em>certain order</em> and refusing to service a specific customer altogether are two different things. That customer would still be able to buy/order, just not <em>that</em> particular product.</p><p>What would you do if someone asked for a cake with a Nazi cross topping, or the face of Hitler, or "God does not exist" or "I don't support gay marriage"?</p><p>I would refuse to make <em>these</em> cakes but I wouldn't refuse to sell them any of the other cakes. Therefore I'm not discriminating the customer.</p><p></p><p>There's no such thing as irriational belief. The whole point of believing is that you believe something without having or wanting proof.</p><p>It may result in irrational practice, like this cake-drama.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Willie Oleson, post: 17918, member: 8"] No-one should be allowed to discriminate anyone, and that's why we have the anti-discrimination law. I never contested that. But I was confused by your "they [I]shouldn't[/I] be in business" comment. Because should/shouldn't is an optional situation. Illegal practice is not. But I think we've sorted that part of the discussion. I disagree. Refusing to fulfil a [I]certain order[/I] and refusing to service a specific customer altogether are two different things. That customer would still be able to buy/order, just not [I]that[/I] particular product. What would you do if someone asked for a cake with a Nazi cross topping, or the face of Hitler, or "God does not exist" or "I don't support gay marriage"? I would refuse to make [I]these[/I] cakes but I wouldn't refuse to sell them any of the other cakes. Therefore I'm not discriminating the customer. There's no such thing as irriational belief. The whole point of believing is that you believe something without having or wanting proof. It may result in irrational practice, like this cake-drama. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
6 + 4 =
Post reply
Forums
News & Politics
Headline News
Homophobic bakers lose 'gay cake' appeal.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top