Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
Nancy Pelosi Tells Meet The Press: No Compromise With Trump On The Wall
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frank Underwood" data-source="post: 58606" data-attributes="member: 35"><p>I can't speak to any hidden agendas they may or may not have. The fact is Wikileaks released Hillary and DNC emails showing corruption, Snowden provided transparency into the NSA's surveillance program, and the Intercept revealed Maddow's preference for Russia-themed stories lacking in skepticism from the intelligence community. There was also her suggestion that deescalating tensions with Russia would be a sign of collusion.</p><p></p><p>When it comes to the substantive nature of that information, I'm most certainly glad it's out there. Even if some of it was obtained through nefarious means, it still revealed that the targets were also nefarious.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I actually agree. But outside of going to war, what exactly should our response be to Russia's election meddling? </p><p></p><p></p><p>My winning strategy is so "ridiculous" that Bernie gets cheers, while Tom Perez is booed. That's why rural hoodwinked Trump supporters tell Bernie he cares more about them than Mitch McConnell.</p><p></p><p>What good is electability without sound policies? The people who "accomplished nothing" are the ones who conspired to make Hillary the Democratic nominee and the people who voted for her in the primaries.</p><p></p><p>Maybe you should rethink that whole "electability" premise.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The people who are delusional are the ones who purposely turn a blind eye to Hillary's quarter century support of policies associated with neoconservatives. A valid argument can be made that Trump's policies are even more extreme and harmful. With policies like the wall, the travel bans, and a proposed health care plan that would leave 25 million more people uninsured, I would agree. But what Democrats seem incapable of understanding is that people are tired of having to choose between the lesser of two evils. They practically forced this corporate shill war monger on us and said "Vote for her or you'll get Trump," and the people said "No."</p><p></p><p>If your attacks on my principles make you feel better about yourself, more power to you. I voted my conscience. Regardless of how you frame it, I'm not responsible for how the rest of the country voted.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]rWEDh4XpgQc[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frank Underwood, post: 58606, member: 35"] I can't speak to any hidden agendas they may or may not have. The fact is Wikileaks released Hillary and DNC emails showing corruption, Snowden provided transparency into the NSA's surveillance program, and the Intercept revealed Maddow's preference for Russia-themed stories lacking in skepticism from the intelligence community. There was also her suggestion that deescalating tensions with Russia would be a sign of collusion. When it comes to the substantive nature of that information, I'm most certainly glad it's out there. Even if some of it was obtained through nefarious means, it still revealed that the targets were also nefarious. I actually agree. But outside of going to war, what exactly should our response be to Russia's election meddling? My winning strategy is so "ridiculous" that Bernie gets cheers, while Tom Perez is booed. That's why rural hoodwinked Trump supporters tell Bernie he cares more about them than Mitch McConnell. What good is electability without sound policies? The people who "accomplished nothing" are the ones who conspired to make Hillary the Democratic nominee and the people who voted for her in the primaries. Maybe you should rethink that whole "electability" premise. The people who are delusional are the ones who purposely turn a blind eye to Hillary's quarter century support of policies associated with neoconservatives. A valid argument can be made that Trump's policies are even more extreme and harmful. With policies like the wall, the travel bans, and a proposed health care plan that would leave 25 million more people uninsured, I would agree. But what Democrats seem incapable of understanding is that people are tired of having to choose between the lesser of two evils. They practically forced this corporate shill war monger on us and said "Vote for her or you'll get Trump," and the people said "No." If your attacks on my principles make you feel better about yourself, more power to you. I voted my conscience. Regardless of how you frame it, I'm not responsible for how the rest of the country voted. [MEDIA=youtube]rWEDh4XpgQc[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who played Sue Ellen in Dallas?
Post reply
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
Nancy Pelosi Tells Meet The Press: No Compromise With Trump On The Wall
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top