Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Frank Underwood" data-source="post: 45485" data-attributes="member: 35">I&#039;ve been away for awhile, and was surprised to see I was mentioned in a discussion I wasn&#039;t a part of.&nbsp;&nbsp; But since you brought me up, here&#039;s my response:Trashing a politician is easy when you have the facts on your side.&nbsp; All I did was mention her policy record, her flip flops, her condescension, her hubris, and her condoning of Palestinian election tampering.&nbsp; If you&#039;re going to feign moral superiority over a foreign government meddling in an election, you shouldn&#039;t be caught doing the same thing.&nbsp; Hillary&#039;s also had this to say about refugee children:&nbsp; “We have to send a clear message: Just because your child gets across the border, that doesn’t mean the child gets to stay.&quot;&nbsp; She&#039;s supported the neocon position on gay rights, criminal justice, welfare, and foreign policy, so you&#039;re damn right I trashed her! If you want to beat a guy like Trump, you need a candidate who refuses to sell out the progressive base in favor of the corporations, the banks, and the military industrial complex.&nbsp; We had such a candidate, and even though the polls showed him beating Trump by double digits (unlike Hillary), they still conspired against him.&nbsp; But the centrist wing of the party couldn&#039;t care less.&nbsp; In fact, they believe corruption and lousy policy positions should be swept under the rug.&nbsp; Hillary and corporate Democrat sell outs aren&#039;t the bad guys, it&#039;s the people who expose their activities that are bad.&nbsp; Most Democrats on Soapchat favor the establishment wing of the party, which is why my anti-Hillary posts were met with resistance.&nbsp; I&#039;m a vocal critic of Trump as well, but the fact that I refused to vote for someone as corrupt and unprincipled as Hillary negates that in their eyes.That said, I fully acknowledged Hillary&#039;s popular vote win, but said it was a bad strategy to ignore the rust belt states.&nbsp; I believe the electoral college should be abolished, but you can&#039;t campaign like it doesn&#039;t exist.&nbsp; You understand me better than the liberals here do.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Frank Underwood, post: 45485, member: 35"] I've been away for awhile, and was surprised to see I was mentioned in a discussion I wasn't a part of. But since you brought me up, here's my response: Trashing a politician is easy when you have the facts on your side. All I did was mention her policy record, her flip flops, her condescension, her hubris, and her condoning of Palestinian election tampering. If you're going to feign moral superiority over a foreign government meddling in an election, you shouldn't be caught doing the same thing. Hillary's also had this to say about refugee children: “We have to send a clear message: Just because your child gets across the border, that doesn’t mean the child gets to stay." She's supported the neocon position on gay rights, criminal justice, welfare, and foreign policy, so you're damn right I trashed her! If you want to beat a guy like Trump, you need a candidate who refuses to sell out the progressive base in favor of the corporations, the banks, and the military industrial complex. We had such a candidate, and even though the polls showed him beating Trump by double digits (unlike Hillary), they still conspired against him. But the centrist wing of the party couldn't care less. In fact, they believe corruption and lousy policy positions should be swept under the rug. Hillary and corporate Democrat sell outs aren't the bad guys, it's the people who expose their activities that are bad. Most Democrats on Soapchat favor the establishment wing of the party, which is why my anti-Hillary posts were met with resistance. I'm a vocal critic of Trump as well, but the fact that I refused to vote for someone as corrupt and unprincipled as Hillary negates that in their eyes. That said, I fully acknowledged Hillary's popular vote win, but said it was a bad strategy to ignore the rust belt states. I believe the electoral college should be abolished, but you can't campaign like it doesn't exist. You understand me better than the liberals here do. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Who played Sue Ellen in Dallas?