Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Karin Schill" data-source="post: 193816">Thanks for sharing. The first thing that strikes me about this interview is the difference in style compared to Prince Andrew&#039;s interview. The interview with Prince Andrew was just him talking for approximately 50 minutes, answering questions and we hear what they ask him.This was a more polished, edited program with images filmed from New&nbsp; York, Florida and that island. There was also background information&nbsp; told in a voice over. It was really a short documentary. The way it is presented makes it sound like the maker of the program is siding with Virginia Giuffre and are really eager to tell her side of the story.The impression it gives is that Virginia Giuffre comes across looking sympathetic. She has obviously lived a tough life and although it was not a smart choice to join Epstein for a year it is explained to us why she did it. She was vulnerable and had already been sexually abused since childhood.The girls are obviously the victims in this story and Epstein was a disgusting man who abused his money and power.Then as for Prince Andrew&#039;s role in all of this. I feel like he&#039;s become sort of a scapegoat!He was not the worst offender but since the worst offender is dead let&#039;s go after the most famous of his friends. So regardless of what is the truth I&#039;d say he is in deep shit. He knew Epstein and his childhood friend was involved too, as she supplied Epsteins with girls and had threesomes with them. At least that&#039;s how it sounds like in this documentary. So there is definitely some guilt by association. But I am still not convinced that Prince Andrew was aware of that Epstein trafficked the girls. But I guess the truth will come out if he will testify under oath in the USA.P.S. The documentary also had some images with Donald Trump and Epstein. Since they obviously knew each other too, I wonder how long it will be before someone starts pointing fingers at the current President of the USA!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Karin Schill, post: 193816"] Thanks for sharing. The first thing that strikes me about this interview is the difference in style compared to Prince Andrew's interview. The interview with Prince Andrew was just him talking for approximately 50 minutes, answering questions and we hear what they ask him. This was a more polished, edited program with images filmed from New York, Florida and that island. There was also background information told in a voice over. It was really a short documentary. The way it is presented makes it sound like the maker of the program is siding with Virginia Giuffre and are really eager to tell her side of the story. The impression it gives is that Virginia Giuffre comes across looking sympathetic. She has obviously lived a tough life and although it was not a smart choice to join Epstein for a year it is explained to us why she did it. She was vulnerable and had already been sexually abused since childhood. The girls are obviously the victims in this story and Epstein was a disgusting man who abused his money and power. Then as for Prince Andrew's role in all of this. I feel like he's become sort of a scapegoat! He was not the worst offender but since the worst offender is dead let's go after the most famous of his friends. So regardless of what is the truth I'd say he is in deep shit. He knew Epstein and his childhood friend was involved too, as she supplied Epsteins with girls and had threesomes with them. At least that's how it sounds like in this documentary. So there is definitely some guilt by association. But I am still not convinced that Prince Andrew was aware of that Epstein trafficked the girls. But I guess the truth will come out if he will testify under oath in the USA. P.S. The documentary also had some images with Donald Trump and Epstein. Since they obviously knew each other too, I wonder how long it will be before someone starts pointing fingers at the current President of the USA! [/QUOTE]

Verification

6 + 4 =