New posts

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="SueEllenRules!" data-source="post: 44282" data-attributes="member: 87">Clinton voters generally don't subscribe to batsh!t crazy conspiracy theories that have no credible evidence whatsoever to back them up. Reality is already strange enough. For example, Russia successfully conspiring to deliver the American presidency to their candidate of choice.What utter bullsh!t. If Hillary had lost the popular vote but won the Electoral College, your attitude would do a 180 so fast, the earth would reverse its rotation.That would be a first.Some states have a far bigger say. Despite having a far smaller population.Huh? <img src="http://yoursmiles.org/msmile/think/m1714.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":confuse:" title="Confuse    :confuse:" data-shortname=":confuse:" />So some of the fifty entities should have more electoral power per capita than others? There would be something wrong with every citizen within the fifty having an equal say in matters that affect the union?So much for one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.Or absolutely disgusting, depending on how you choose to spin and interpret it.And here I thought the nimrod just got incredibly lucky because of 77,000 fellow nimrods in 3 states.New York? Where Hillary beat Trump by 1,732,973 votes (58% versus 36%)? This is where you think an @$$hole like Trump could pick up votes?California? Where Hillary beat Trump by 4,269,978 votes (62% versus 32%)? Sounds like a prime target for a xenophobe if I've ever seen one.Texas? Where Trump won by 807,179 votes (52% versus 43%)? Well, at least that's the first scenario that makes any sense at all, considering that 37.6% of the population there is Hispanic and would likely be more than happy to sell Trump down the river. No, I mean the sociopath who campaigned on racism, xenophobia, and misogyny and apparently tapped into the instincts of an astounding number of people as depraved as he is.That's the way it is. So it wasn't a lie when Trump claimed he had the greatest Electoral College victory since Ronald Reagan?He lost the popular vote by nearly 3 million and barely won the electoral vote in 3 essential states by a margin of <1%. Sounds like a real landslide.Not to mention 63 million chumps.Clinton Has More Than Twice Trump’s Campaign Cash in Race’s Final Days<a href="http://fortune.com/2016/10/28/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-campaign-fundraising/" target="_blank">http://fortune.com/2016/10/28/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-campaign-fundraising/</a>You really should work for the Trump administration. You've already got the "alternative facts" requirement down pat.Again, 77,000 nimrods in 3 states. It's called pure luck/wretched aberration/grievous technicality/freak of nature. Take your pick. Brilliant strategist? <img src="http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/rolling-lol.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rlol:" title="Roll lol    :rlol:" data-shortname=":rlol:" />.Only in America can you get 3 million fewer votes than your opponent and still come out a "winner."</blockquote>

Verification: Who played JR Ewing?