Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Michael Torrance" data-source="post: 141015" data-attributes="member: 719">Well, it was a mediocre episode: nothing as bad as episode 4 but nothing as exciting as episode 3 either. The episode spent a lot of its time on the Wizard of Oz fantasy, a sure sign that the writers did not have enough actual plot. And it&#039;s too bad: they could have shown us what the hell is happening with the Colbys (news flash for the dinner: they are family too), for instance, or have Claudia do more than stand around making her baby cry. That Culhane&#039;s family did not even mention the father dying because of the C.A. cover-up is peach Dynasty once again being a land of no consequences: no matter what you do in one episode, the next one is a complete reset. [USER=152]@Snarky&#039;s Ghost[/USER] had said in a thread that in old TV he had found soaps more realistic than the stand alone dramas in a way, because in those a character would be shot in one episode and not even have a scar the next. Well, peach Dynasty is pretty much unlike a soap in that aspect: the show reboots itself every episode so, to quote Freddy Mercury, nothing really matters. In one, it is a classic soap drama complete with twists and revelations and blasts from the past. Next, it is a screwball comedy in Paraguay. Then, it is a pretext for a Wizard of Oz goof for Fallon.We have two weddings planned for the future: Fallon and Michael, and Blake and Cristal 2.0. What are the chances both will happen?While Liam&#039;s appearance in the oz dream was as goofy as all of it, his voice sure sounded sexy as hell. After Matthew, that is now a count of two sexy and alluring men the show eliminated. Good job, peach Dynasty.Alexis in that trailer is still awful to watch and a painful comparison of the studio in the classic show. I am not too invested in the baby, because I know how quickly this show likes to wrap up its plots and move on to more important issues (like, perhaps an upcoming Glee homage!)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Michael Torrance, post: 141015, member: 719"] Well, it was a mediocre episode: nothing as bad as episode 4 but nothing as exciting as episode 3 either. The episode spent a lot of its time on the [I]Wizard of Oz [/I]fantasy, a sure sign that the writers did not have enough actual plot. And it's too bad: they could have shown us what the hell is happening with the Colbys (news flash for the dinner: they are family too), for instance, or have Claudia do more than stand around making her baby cry. That Culhane's family did not even mention the father dying because of the C.A. cover-up is peach Dynasty once again being a land of no consequences: no matter what you do in one episode, the next one is a complete reset. [USER=152]@Snarky's Ghost[/USER] had said in a thread that in old TV he had found soaps more realistic than the stand alone dramas in a way, because in those a character would be shot in one episode and not even have a scar the next. Well, peach Dynasty is pretty much [I]unlike[/I] a soap in that aspect: the show reboots itself every episode so, to quote Freddy Mercury, nothing really matters. In one, it is a classic soap drama complete with twists and revelations and blasts from the past. Next, it is a screwball comedy in Paraguay. Then, it is a pretext for a Wizard of Oz goof for Fallon. We have two weddings planned for the future: Fallon and Michael, and Blake and Cristal 2.0. What are the chances both will happen? While Liam's appearance in the oz dream was as goofy as all of it, his voice sure sounded sexy as hell. After Matthew, that is now a count of two sexy and alluring men the show eliminated. Good job, peach Dynasty. Alexis in that trailer is still awful to watch and a painful comparison of the studio in the classic show. I am not too invested in the baby, because I know how quickly this show likes to wrap up its plots and move on to more important issues (like, perhaps an upcoming Glee homage!) [/QUOTE]

Verification

Who played JR Ewing?