Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Frank Underwood" data-source="post: 336167" data-attributes="member: 35">Funny, I&#039;ve only ever used the &quot;informative&quot; reaction in a sincere way.&nbsp; I never even thought of it being used sarcastically. Several years ago, a poster clicked the dislike button on many of my posts.&nbsp; It had nothing to do with their dislike of my posts and everything to do with their dislike of me.Even with the negative reactions gone, I still see people use the positive reactions as a means to insult people.&nbsp; Like when a poster bashes another member, and their post receives the &quot;winning&quot; reaction from their pals.&nbsp; If the goal is to prevent hurt feelings, getting rid of the &quot;mean&quot; reactions isn&#039;t enough to do that.&nbsp; That&#039;s why I&#039;d like to see the negative reactions return in order to directly convey displeasure with a particular post (including those that are only being liked to get under another member&#039;s skin.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Frank Underwood, post: 336167, member: 35"] Funny, I've only ever used the "informative" reaction in a sincere way. I never even thought of it being used sarcastically. Several years ago, a poster clicked the dislike button on many of my posts. It had nothing to do with their dislike of my posts and everything to do with their dislike of me. Even with the negative reactions gone, I still see people use the positive reactions as a means to insult people. Like when a poster bashes another member, and their post receives the "winning" reaction from their pals. If the goal is to prevent hurt feelings, getting rid of the "mean" reactions isn't enough to do that. That's why I'd like to see the negative reactions return in order to directly convey displeasure with a particular post (including those that are only being liked to get under another member's skin.) [/QUOTE]

Verification

What month follows July?