Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ClassyCo" data-source="post: 336651" data-attributes="member: 7">I&#039;m quite pleased with our reaction functions. Even when I react to another poster&#039;s reply, I will generally reply to it with another post. I like healthy discussions and that consists of people conversing with each other. If I &quot;agree&quot; to someone&#039;s comment, what did I agree with specifically? Sometimes shorter replies might not require a comment of agreement, but lengthier ones seem to warrant such replies to specifically state what I agreed with -- and perhaps what I didn&#039;t agree with.Either way, I don&#039;t really think about the reaction functions. Sure, I use them, but I don&#039;t necessarily think about which ones we&#039;ve got and which ones have gone away. I just use what we&#039;ve got, and if none of the apply, I just simply like the post (therefore acknowledging it) and then simply reply to it and explain where I agree or disagree concerning the said post.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ClassyCo, post: 336651, member: 7"] I'm quite pleased with our reaction functions. Even when I react to another poster's reply, I will generally reply to it with another post. I like healthy discussions and that consists of people conversing with each other. If I "agree" to someone's comment, what did I agree with specifically? Sometimes shorter replies might not require a comment of agreement, but lengthier ones seem to warrant such replies to specifically state what I agreed with -- and perhaps what I didn't agree with. Either way, I don't really think about the reaction functions. Sure, I use them, but I don't necessarily think about which ones we've got and which ones have gone away. I just use what we've got, and if none of the apply, I just simply like the post (therefore acknowledging it) and then simply reply to it and explain where I agree or disagree concerning the said post. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Who played Sue Ellen in Dallas?