Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JR-Rules" data-source="post: 301234" data-attributes="member: 60">Pretty funny cause I thought the same thing at first. Then I tried to understand how the movie editing works and why some scenes are deleted and, in that case, why they didn&#039;t mention the Ben Gardner&#039;s head.I really thinks it&#039;s all about rhythm and going to the main point.I think in that scene between Brody, Hooper &amp; Vaughn, all the viewers are now well aware of what the shark is capable of even if we already knew the shark was massive (because of the bite radius).But in that scene Spielberg wants Hooper &amp; Brody letting the mayor know how big and dangerous is the shark. So when Brody is telling the mayor that Gardner&#039;s boat was all chewed up, it involves Ben Gardner&#039;s death without extending the scene. Then Hooper add the tooth size and then that the fin size painted has the correct proportions.The Spielberg&#039;s main goal was all about how gigantic and powerful the shark is to convince the mayor of the urgency. Adding Gardner&#039;s death doesn&#039;t implies that since everybody already know the shark is a man killer. But this is an unprecedent man killer...Just my thoughts <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />By the way It always bugged me why Hooper would go in the water when he knows there&#039;s a man-eating shark out there. He seems pretty sure the shark is not there at that special moment <img src="http://www.planetsmilies.com/smilies/rolleye/rolleye0010.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":re:" title="RE&nbsp; &nbsp; :re:" data-shortname=":re:" />He survived... Why? Simply because he was bare feet when Bruce attacks him.So I guess Ted goes to the nearest mall to buy some shoes, went back to the pond, put a shoe on his cut leg then letting her go in the water...<img src="http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/rolling-lol.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rlol:" title="Roll lol&nbsp; &nbsp; :rlol:" data-shortname=":rlol:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="JR-Rules, post: 301234, member: 60"] Pretty funny cause I thought the same thing at first. Then I tried to understand how the movie editing works and why some scenes are deleted and, in that case, why they didn't mention the Ben Gardner's head. I really thinks it's all about rhythm and going to the main point. I think in that scene between Brody, Hooper & Vaughn, all the viewers are now well aware of what the shark is capable of even if we already knew the shark was massive (because of the bite radius). But in that scene Spielberg wants Hooper & Brody letting the mayor know how big and dangerous is the shark. So when Brody is telling the mayor that Gardner's boat was all chewed up, it involves Ben Gardner's death without extending the scene. Then Hooper add the tooth size and then that the fin size painted has the correct proportions. The Spielberg's main goal was all about how gigantic and powerful the shark is to convince the mayor of the urgency. Adding Gardner's death doesn't implies that since everybody already know the shark is a man killer. But this is an unprecedent man killer... Just my thoughts ;) By the way It always bugged me why Hooper would go in the water when he knows there's a man-eating shark out there. He seems pretty sure the shark is not there at that special moment :re: He survived... Why? Simply because he was bare feet when Bruce attacks him. So I guess Ted goes to the nearest mall to buy some shoes, went back to the pond, put a shoe on his cut leg then letting her go in the water...:rlol: [/QUOTE]

Verification

Who played JR Ewing?