Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
They're eating the cats! They're eating the dogs!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frank Underwood" data-source="post: 410186" data-attributes="member: 35"><p>Yet again, pointing out hypocrisy and double standards does not equate to me defending or supporting Trump. In contrast, you <strong><em>actually</em></strong> <em><strong>do</strong></em> support genocide-enabler Harris.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I didn't imply anything. I simply pointed out the optics, as well as the fact that Clinton supporters would have reacted differently if he had to face a Trump-appointed judge.</p><p></p><p>There's also a ton of media bias against Trump. It's hard to know for sure if the jury found Trump guilty on the evidence, or if other influences helped them reach their decision.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Your selective fact checking says a lot. Stein was at that dinner in Moscow to push a peace deal with the Middle East. She called for ending Russia's bombing of Syria and she also said we should freeze the funding of countries that fund terrorism. Stein didn't get to speak directly to Putin because there wasn't an interpreter. As for Flynn, Stein met him briefly and told him she was there to promote a peace deal in the Middle East. Flynn wasn't interested, and that was the end of their conversation. Of course, it's not uncommon for politicians to meet with nefarious world leader for a variety of reasons. Hillary Clinton met Putin and even shook his hand, but that didn't make the headlines.</p><p></p><p>Stein's recognition of Putin as a war criminal is also far more nuanced than you're claiming. Stein said "So, what we said about Putin was that his invasion of Ukraine is criminal. It's a criminal and murderous war." When pressed further about it, Stein stated "In so many words, yes he is. If you want to pull him back, if you are a world leader, you don't begin your conversation by calling someone a war criminal." She added that she has described Netanyahu as a war criminal because there is a "clear strategy and we have very strong support across the world." Of course, the fact that she wants diplomacy and to stop funding Ukraine and Israel makes her <strong><em>infinitely</em></strong> better than Trump and the Dems.</p><p></p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.newsweek.com/jill-stein-vladimir-putin-war-criminal-1954965" target="_blank">Jill Stein's Response to Putin Being Labeled 'War Criminal' Goes Viral - Newsweek</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frank Underwood, post: 410186, member: 35"] Yet again, pointing out hypocrisy and double standards does not equate to me defending or supporting Trump. In contrast, you [B][I]actually[/I][/B] [I][B]do[/B][/I] support genocide-enabler Harris. I didn't imply anything. I simply pointed out the optics, as well as the fact that Clinton supporters would have reacted differently if he had to face a Trump-appointed judge. There's also a ton of media bias against Trump. It's hard to know for sure if the jury found Trump guilty on the evidence, or if other influences helped them reach their decision. Your selective fact checking says a lot. Stein was at that dinner in Moscow to push a peace deal with the Middle East. She called for ending Russia's bombing of Syria and she also said we should freeze the funding of countries that fund terrorism. Stein didn't get to speak directly to Putin because there wasn't an interpreter. As for Flynn, Stein met him briefly and told him she was there to promote a peace deal in the Middle East. Flynn wasn't interested, and that was the end of their conversation. Of course, it's not uncommon for politicians to meet with nefarious world leader for a variety of reasons. Hillary Clinton met Putin and even shook his hand, but that didn't make the headlines. Stein's recognition of Putin as a war criminal is also far more nuanced than you're claiming. Stein said "So, what we said about Putin was that his invasion of Ukraine is criminal. It's a criminal and murderous war." When pressed further about it, Stein stated "In so many words, yes he is. If you want to pull him back, if you are a world leader, you don't begin your conversation by calling someone a war criminal." She added that she has described Netanyahu as a war criminal because there is a "clear strategy and we have very strong support across the world." Of course, the fact that she wants diplomacy and to stop funding Ukraine and Israel makes her [B][I]infinitely[/I][/B] better than Trump and the Dems. Source: [URL='https://www.newsweek.com/jill-stein-vladimir-putin-war-criminal-1954965']Jill Stein's Response to Putin Being Labeled 'War Criminal' Goes Viral - Newsweek[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What month follows July?
Post reply
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
They're eating the cats! They're eating the dogs!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top