Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
They're eating the cats! They're eating the dogs!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frank Underwood" data-source="post: 410349" data-attributes="member: 35"><p>We have different standards. Funding a genocide in Gaza and a war in Ukraine does not equate to moral superiority to me. "Ceasefire" and "two state solution" are just buzz words. The Democrats always pretend to be advocates of diplomacy, even though they support and fund these wars as much as Republicans do. Dick Cheney and the rest of the neocon mutants didn't support Harris because she's the peace candidate. Trump wants to end funding for the Ukraine war, which is the only reason they're backing Harris.</p><p></p><p>Harris also owns the legacy of the Biden Administration. As VP, it's reasonable to believe she supported his decisions. Apparently, the border didn't matter until an election year. As prosecutor, she fought to uphold wrongful convictions and to keep nonviolent offenders locked up to be used as cheap prison labor. She cracked down on marijuana offenses, despite laughing about smoking it herself. She supports fracking, despite her purported concern about climate change. So yes, she's not morally superior to Trump.</p><p></p><p>On top of that, Biden didn't fight to raise the minimum wage like he promised, and he oversaw an inflation crisis. Are we really supposed to believe Harris's newfound concern for the middle class is real? Again, we're supposed to forget that she was VP for the last 3 years. Harris acts like she's bringing something new to the table, but if she truly plans on offering something different, why didn't she object to Biden's policies? Obama promised to implement the public option, codify reproductive rights, and end all of the wars.</p><p></p><p>It turned out he was full of crap just like Biden. That means Harris is likely full of crap too.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It's not a losing argument. Dems falsely called Hunter's laptop "Russian disinformation," yet they believe every accusation against Trump (including the alleged "pee tape.")</p><p></p><p>Hunter's also the bottom of the barrel. The bigger issue is that war criminal presidents (including Trump) are never held accountable. So much for those "checks and balances."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frank Underwood, post: 410349, member: 35"] We have different standards. Funding a genocide in Gaza and a war in Ukraine does not equate to moral superiority to me. "Ceasefire" and "two state solution" are just buzz words. The Democrats always pretend to be advocates of diplomacy, even though they support and fund these wars as much as Republicans do. Dick Cheney and the rest of the neocon mutants didn't support Harris because she's the peace candidate. Trump wants to end funding for the Ukraine war, which is the only reason they're backing Harris. Harris also owns the legacy of the Biden Administration. As VP, it's reasonable to believe she supported his decisions. Apparently, the border didn't matter until an election year. As prosecutor, she fought to uphold wrongful convictions and to keep nonviolent offenders locked up to be used as cheap prison labor. She cracked down on marijuana offenses, despite laughing about smoking it herself. She supports fracking, despite her purported concern about climate change. So yes, she's not morally superior to Trump. On top of that, Biden didn't fight to raise the minimum wage like he promised, and he oversaw an inflation crisis. Are we really supposed to believe Harris's newfound concern for the middle class is real? Again, we're supposed to forget that she was VP for the last 3 years. Harris acts like she's bringing something new to the table, but if she truly plans on offering something different, why didn't she object to Biden's policies? Obama promised to implement the public option, codify reproductive rights, and end all of the wars. It turned out he was full of crap just like Biden. That means Harris is likely full of crap too. It's not a losing argument. Dems falsely called Hunter's laptop "Russian disinformation," yet they believe every accusation against Trump (including the alleged "pee tape.") Hunter's also the bottom of the barrel. The bigger issue is that war criminal presidents (including Trump) are never held accountable. So much for those "checks and balances." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who played JR Ewing?
Post reply
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
They're eating the cats! They're eating the dogs!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top