Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mel O&amp;#039;Drama" data-source="post: 177048" data-attributes="member: 23">Anytime. I only stumbled upon it again very recently myself.You&#039;ll kick yourself when you work it out.&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />Not that I can remember. One of the big problems is that the channel on which it aired was split up into perhaps a dozen different independent regions. Each region aired the series at its own pace, with sometimes years&#039; worth of differences between the episodes in different areas. So it would have been really difficult to run a feature on the series in TV magazines.But I&#039;m sure Rowena Wallace must have appeared on a UK cover somewhere at some point during the Eighties. Probably something like Woman&#039;s Own magazine. Oh great. Do you know what that in connection with?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mel O'Drama, post: 177048, member: 23"] Anytime. I only stumbled upon it again very recently myself. You'll kick yourself when you work it out. ;) Not that I can remember. One of the big problems is that the channel on which it aired was split up into perhaps a dozen different independent regions. Each region aired the series at its own pace, with sometimes years' worth of differences between the episodes in different areas. So it would have been really difficult to run a feature on the series in TV magazines. But I'm sure Rowena Wallace must have appeared on a UK cover somewhere at some point during the Eighties. Probably something like [I]Woman's Own[/I] magazine. Oh great. Do you know what that in connection with? [/QUOTE]

Verification

6 + 4 =