Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Spooky Owl!" data-source="post: 227475" data-attributes="member: 57984">Yes, I think so. And that was the correct choice even though, at the time, it was annoying and seemed as if they'd just dropped the plot and moved on for no reason.It allowed the viewer, then and now, to mull over who Wes really was. That's part of the Shakespearean nature of the tale.I just wished they'd made reference to it years later in some cryptic way. But with the messiness of the later years, it didn't really matter.Good points all. And I think this was largely intentional, too.</blockquote>

Poison your name this Hallowe'en