Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="stevew" data-source="post: 236901" data-attributes="member: 130"><p>Thank you.  Exactly what I was looking for.  So you’re A really but . . .   And I would agree.  You’ll notice in B I do change the name.  I was surprised the support for the name Ewing Oil.  I think the key was “Ewing” and Ewing Oil is better off as a subsidiary of a larger company.  Really the key should be each generation adds something.  So Jock = Ewing Oil.  JR = Ewing Industries with Ewing Oil as a subsidiary.  John Ross = Ewing Enterprises with a controlling interest in Ewing Industries with Ewing Oil as a subsidiary.   Anyway that’s my thinking.  I’m not sure if a great story is told and such names are used, anyone would really care.  But what we got was a company with no connection to Ewing Oil so maybe that’s what brings up the feelings to protect the original name.</p></blockquote><p></p>