Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The forum is about to undergo some crucial server updates
There may be a little downtime, but we'll be back online as soon as possible.
Watch this thread for updates
Forums
Global Telly Talk
Classic US TV
Appreciating Charlie's Angels
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ClassyCo" data-source="post: 217605" data-attributes="member: 7"><p>It's interesting you bring this up. You're absolutely right. </p><p></p><p>I think ABC wanted Shelley Hack because she was in the Charlie perfume commercials, and they thought her being on <em>Charlie's Angels </em>would be <em>cute</em>. They (as in the network heavyweights) probably thought she would bring a breathe of fresh air, a sense of class to a show slowing loosing its sizzle. I also know costume designer Nolan Miller was a big fan of Shelley. He routinely defines her as "chic" and raves about how she just knew how to wear his clothes. He says "everybody in wardrobe fell in love with her," and he sometimes edges himself as being the one man that suggested Shelley to Aaron Spelling to play Tiffany. </p><p></p><p>If Shelley's acting was the issue, then they took yet another step-down when they brought Tanya Roberts in. It was painfully obvious that the producers were judging Tanya's credibility based solely on her physical appearance. Her skills as an actress are sparse; she seems wooden, and although they try to edge her into the trio harder than they did Shelley, it doesn't work for her. The writing that last season was drab and the performances were bland. Nothing about it was new, and Tanya not being from the police academy just tossed the whole concept off-balance. It was a desperate attempt by the network to keep their hot show hot and retaining its sexiness. It didn't work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ClassyCo, post: 217605, member: 7"] It's interesting you bring this up. You're absolutely right. I think ABC wanted Shelley Hack because she was in the Charlie perfume commercials, and they thought her being on [I]Charlie's Angels [/I]would be [I]cute[/I]. They (as in the network heavyweights) probably thought she would bring a breathe of fresh air, a sense of class to a show slowing loosing its sizzle. I also know costume designer Nolan Miller was a big fan of Shelley. He routinely defines her as "chic" and raves about how she just knew how to wear his clothes. He says "everybody in wardrobe fell in love with her," and he sometimes edges himself as being the one man that suggested Shelley to Aaron Spelling to play Tiffany. If Shelley's acting was the issue, then they took yet another step-down when they brought Tanya Roberts in. It was painfully obvious that the producers were judging Tanya's credibility based solely on her physical appearance. Her skills as an actress are sparse; she seems wooden, and although they try to edge her into the trio harder than they did Shelley, it doesn't work for her. The writing that last season was drab and the performances were bland. Nothing about it was new, and Tanya not being from the police academy just tossed the whole concept off-balance. It was a desperate attempt by the network to keep their hot show hot and retaining its sexiness. It didn't work. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What month follows July?
Post reply
Forums
Global Telly Talk
Classic US TV
Appreciating Charlie's Angels
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top