Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Angela Chilling" data-source="post: 444938" data-attributes="member: 33">It's different because there is no law saying you have to consent to drive a car but specific legislation outlawing driving under the influence.It's a more interesting scenario about male sexual consent while they are under the influence. Because a man has to get erect to have sex, it's more difficult to prove that he wasn't aware what was going on because the drugs/alcohol wasn't affecting his ability to get hard (I apologise if my graphic description causes offence). The scenario changes again if he claimed oral sex was performed on him without consent, rather than penetrative vaginal sex. It's so rare that I'm not sure if there is a general view on this and it might just come down to the details of a particular case rather than legal precedent.</blockquote>

Poison your name this Hallowe'en