A little forum update...We're planning an upgrade.

Find out more about what's planned and how you can help support the forum
Click here for the details

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Matthew Blaisdel" data-source="post: 362402" data-attributes="member: 26">No, it does NOT if you give it enough time and GPU power to render properly. Been there, done that myself.Yes, i have them all on my NAS and stream them to the big TV screen and they look amazing compared to the source material. Not the youtube compressed farts, but the original AI upscaled files, that i found online, which are like 4 times the file size of what youtube on 4K settings gives as a stream - and of course that way with artifacts, but that's youtube's fault, not the AI engines'.Those upscales are already one or even two years old and the AI gets better and better as it is in constant development.If they had done THIS with the title sequence, i would be more than satisfied already:[MEDIA=youtube]kvkaCpkfJSs[/MEDIA]And even this example is a year old and the engine is far better now. And the more GPU-power and time you give the upscaler, the better the outcome.Of course it doesn't look the same as a new scan of filmmaterial would look, but still way better than what we got now, and if those negatives of the shots for the opening are lost, AI Upscale is the ONLY option to go anyways, so... better that than what we got at the moment.</blockquote>