Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="thomaswak" data-source="post: 236182" data-attributes="member: 3833">I didn&#039;t like the writers/producers decision to make Pam terminally ill. Worst, without showing her dying,&nbsp; and without confirming her death. But I understand why they did that.- They were stil hoping that Victoria Principal would come back at some point.- They - maybe - had the need to give the audience some (semi) closure about Pam. Fans surely kept on asking about the character, at the time. So with that short scene with the recast, it kinda ended fan&#039;s expectations :&nbsp; Pam was terminally ill. She was never coming back to Dallas. The end.Unless VP would have agreed to come back, and the character (who was never confirmed dead) could be miraculously healed and back.The irony is that TNT Dallas (that I don&#039;t like much) at least gave us real closure, and answers, the best way they could, given what was written in the OG series.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="thomaswak, post: 236182, member: 3833"] I didn't like the writers/producers decision to make Pam terminally ill. Worst, without showing her dying, and without confirming her death. But I understand why they did that. - They were stil hoping that Victoria Principal would come back at some point. - They - maybe - had the need to give the audience some (semi) closure about Pam. Fans surely kept on asking about the character, at the time. So with that short scene with the recast, it kinda ended fan's expectations : Pam was terminally ill. She was never coming back to Dallas. The end. Unless VP would have agreed to come back, and the character (who was never confirmed dead) could be miraculously healed and back. The irony is that TNT [I]Dallas[/I] (that I don't like much) at least gave us real closure, and answers, the best way they could, given what was written in the OG series. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What month follows July?