Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Snarky Oracle!" data-source="post: 443969" data-attributes="member: 57984">The second one&#039;s true. The first one is feminist projection, as we can now see that it&#039;s the women who are turning abortion into a sacrament.Regardless of socialization, women and men are wired differently. When men attain more money, he tends to think in terms of building a family with children; when women attain more money, she tends to think in terms of not having to have children.Women tend to extract; men tend to provide. Or, in the parlance of the present, &quot;Men are in love; women are in business.&quot; (Which is probably why lesbians have the highest level of domestic violence and divorce, gay men have the lowest, and straight couples are in between).The religious texts warn about the dark side of women, but that is dismissed by feminists as being the bias of patriarchal documents (although those same texts discuss the dark side of men all the time, and also instruct men to be respectful of their wives -- which, presumably the feminists are fine with).These are generalizations, of course. Not all men are loving, and not all women are lesbian witches... I think.Anyway, the jurors are now doing TV interviews besmirching the character of the lone hold-out male juror who voted to convict Clancy. And the quasi-liberal corporate media, run by feminists, is hovering on every word, taking this character-assassination quite seriously. Seeming to ask no questions about these sniveling jurors&#039; objectivity, or their continued bullying of the lone juror. (They&#039;re not really talking much about Clancy, nor the kids, but how &quot;arrogant&quot; and &quot;disgusting&quot; the lone juror supposedly was).So the blue-haired pink shirts may be in the minority, but the rest of the witches, lesbian or not, are taking their lead and running with it.[ATTACH=full]59564[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Snarky Oracle!, post: 443969, member: 57984"] The second one's true. The first one is feminist projection, as we can now see that it's the women who are turning abortion into a sacrament. Regardless of socialization, women and men are wired differently. When men attain more money, he tends to think in terms of building a family with children; when women attain more money, she tends to think in terms of not having to have children. Women tend to extract; men tend to provide. Or, in the parlance of the present, "Men are in love; women are in business." (Which is probably why lesbians have the highest level of domestic violence and divorce, gay men have the lowest, and straight couples are in between). The religious texts warn about the dark side of women, but that is dismissed by feminists as being the bias of patriarchal documents (although those same texts discuss the dark side of men all the time, and also instruct men to be respectful of their wives -- which, presumably the feminists are fine with). These are generalizations, of course. Not all men are loving, and not all women are lesbian witches... I think. Anyway, the jurors are now doing TV interviews besmirching the character of the lone hold-out male juror who voted to convict Clancy. And the quasi-liberal corporate media, run by feminists, is hovering on every word, taking this character-assassination quite seriously. Seeming to ask no questions about these sniveling jurors' objectivity, or their continued bullying of the lone juror. (They're not really talking much about Clancy, nor the kids, but how "arrogant" and "disgusting" the lone juror supposedly was). So the blue-haired pink shirts may be in the minority, but the rest of the witches, lesbian or not, are taking their lead and running with it. [ATTACH type="full"]59564[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification

Who played Sue Ellen in Dallas?