Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
#metoo
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frank Underwood" data-source="post: 444080" data-attributes="member: 35"><p><em>Technically</em>, yes. But then the jurors have to be convinced that the defendant was actually psychotic at the time of the killings.</p><p></p><p>Also, the "not guilty by reason of insanity" defense is commonly used as a get out of jail free card. It reminds me of Morrisey on Dallas taking "crazy lessons" to avoid prison and possibly the death penalty. Murder may be a legal term, but even if I believed that Clancy was psychotic when she killed her children, I could never look past the savage nature of the crime. Being institutionalized rather than imprisoned comes with the possibility that the offender could be deemed "rehabilitated," and thus released after a period of time. Personally, I don't think Clancy should ever see the light of day again, regardless of what her mental state was. I just think some crimes are too egregious to ever get past.</p><p></p><p>Of course, the psychologist who evaluated Clancy wasn't convinced she was psychotic, yet all 11 female jurors were. Good thing the jury wasn't unbalanced or anything...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frank Underwood, post: 444080, member: 35"] [I]Technically[/I], yes. But then the jurors have to be convinced that the defendant was actually psychotic at the time of the killings. Also, the "not guilty by reason of insanity" defense is commonly used as a get out of jail free card. It reminds me of Morrisey on Dallas taking "crazy lessons" to avoid prison and possibly the death penalty. Murder may be a legal term, but even if I believed that Clancy was psychotic when she killed her children, I could never look past the savage nature of the crime. Being institutionalized rather than imprisoned comes with the possibility that the offender could be deemed "rehabilitated," and thus released after a period of time. Personally, I don't think Clancy should ever see the light of day again, regardless of what her mental state was. I just think some crimes are too egregious to ever get past. Of course, the psychologist who evaluated Clancy wasn't convinced she was psychotic, yet all 11 female jurors were. Good thing the jury wasn't unbalanced or anything... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
6 + 4 =
Post reply
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
#metoo
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top