Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Entertainment
Music
Michael Jackson movie
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Willie Oleson" data-source="post: 439336" data-attributes="member: 8"><p>Perhaps it's a small step from "parents allowing their children to sleep with Michael Jackson and totally believing there's nothing wrong with it" to "that situation couldn't make it <em>easier</em> for anyone to accuse him".</p><p>Not all child abusers are billionaires and I can imagine that some people would struggle to put that aside - regarding your question "what makes MJ's case different from other child abuse trials".</p><p>Also, it's not the lack of information, people have been <em>overwhelmed</em> with information from all sides and this has the tendency to blur things.</p><p>I'm not saying that this is <em>my</em> opinion but I can understand why the (alleged) flawed perception could exist.</p><p></p><p>I believe things have happened because the alternative "absolutely nothing happened" just seems too outlandish. I'm sure this idea would exist even without the allegations.</p><p>And yet, when people come forward after many years it all seems a bit too on the nose, too self-explanatory, too easy. If there's one thing I hate, it's people explaining a joke.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Willie Oleson, post: 439336, member: 8"] Perhaps it's a small step from "parents allowing their children to sleep with Michael Jackson and totally believing there's nothing wrong with it" to "that situation couldn't make it [I]easier[/I] for anyone to accuse him". Not all child abusers are billionaires and I can imagine that some people would struggle to put that aside - regarding your question "what makes MJ's case different from other child abuse trials". Also, it's not the lack of information, people have been [I]overwhelmed[/I] with information from all sides and this has the tendency to blur things. I'm not saying that this is [I]my[/I] opinion but I can understand why the (alleged) flawed perception could exist. I believe things have happened because the alternative "absolutely nothing happened" just seems too outlandish. I'm sure this idea would exist even without the allegations. And yet, when people come forward after many years it all seems a bit too on the nose, too self-explanatory, too easy. If there's one thing I hate, it's people explaining a joke. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What month follows July?
Post reply
Forums
Entertainment
Music
Michael Jackson movie
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top