Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rove" data-source="post: 160519" data-attributes="member: 100">And this was something I believe Dallas always had, substance. I suspect many viewers enjoyed the escapism that Dynasty offered with its high camp, furs, diamonds and pearls. Others though enjoyed Dallas because of its dust and cow dung. One series could be relied on for realism, the other for its outrageousness - and there was nothing wrong with that. Why couldn&#039;t Dallas and Dynasty coexist? There was room for both? But like a good episode of Game of Thrones both were tussling for the Throne, only to destroy each other in the process. And guess what? Who out maneuvered both Dallas and Dynasty in the end? Freakin&#039; Knots Landing! I say that with all due respect to its legion of fans <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rove, post: 160519, member: 100"] And this was something I believe Dallas always had, substance. I suspect many viewers enjoyed the escapism that Dynasty offered with its high camp, furs, diamonds and pearls. Others though enjoyed Dallas because of its dust and cow dung. One series could be relied on for realism, the other for its outrageousness - and there was nothing wrong with that. Why couldn't Dallas and Dynasty coexist? There was room for both? But like a good episode of [I]Game of Thrones[/I] both were tussling for the Throne, only to destroy each other in the process. And guess what? Who out maneuvered both Dallas and Dynasty in the end? Freakin' Knots Landing[I]! [/I]I say that with all due respect to its legion of fans :) [/QUOTE]

Verification

6 + 4 =