Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Karin" data-source="post: 301032" data-attributes="member: 57167">I don&#039;t know what kind of paper &quot;The Daily Mail&quot; is but I thought the worst of the tabloids in the UK is &quot;The Sun&quot; or?Either way I do know that the UK is notorious for their nasty tabloids, who doesn&#039;t respect any celebrities privacy. Not even the British Royalties are respected by them, as they were really mean to Fergie calling her &quot;Duchess of Pork&quot; etc. already back in the 1980s. They have also been really cruel to Meghan Markle, with their racists slurs, making&nbsp; her flee the country and move back to the US.&nbsp; Poor Princess Diana fared even worse. I still blame the Paparazzi for her death. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite4" alt=":mad:" title="Mad&nbsp; &nbsp; :mad:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":mad:" />So I really dislike the Paparazzi although I&#039;ve never had any encounters with them myself, since I am not famous. Yet I think these kind of informal photos are snapped and distributed to show ordinary people that celebrities are just like us and make us feel better about ourselves. So there is a market for them. Heck back in the 1960s or 1970s Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton had their own photographer on the payroll taking causual photos of them when they were unaware that were then sold to the papers. Maybe that was done to give the movie audience the kind of photos they wanted without the paparazzi profitting from it?I did end up clicking the link to see the Linda photos everyone was talking about. I know I shouldn&#039;t have but I was curious. I didn&#039;t read the article though. I think Linda looks beautiful without make up and in glasses. She doesn&#039;t look her age and I do love her.I don&#039;t see how the paparazzi snapping photos of Linda doing grocery shopping is any different from them snapping photos of Patrick with his girlfriend the other week. I guess this means that they still consider Dallas to be newsworthy.But if the papers didn&#039;t buy the paparazzi photos and distribute them there would be no market for them. So yes do write the paper that we&#039;d love to read a nice article about Linda with nice photos. Not these type of photos. I think this type of journalism that only writes nasty headlines to paparazzi photos are the worst kind that is giving the whole profession a bad rep.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Karin, post: 301032, member: 57167"] I don't know what kind of paper "The Daily Mail" is but I thought the worst of the tabloids in the UK is "The Sun" or? Either way I do know that the UK is notorious for their nasty tabloids, who doesn't respect any celebrities privacy. Not even the British Royalties are respected by them, as they were really mean to Fergie calling her "Duchess of Pork" etc. already back in the 1980s. They have also been really cruel to Meghan Markle, with their racists slurs, making her flee the country and move back to the US. Poor Princess Diana fared even worse. I still blame the Paparazzi for her death. :mad: So I really dislike the Paparazzi although I've never had any encounters with them myself, since I am not famous. Yet I think these kind of informal photos are snapped and distributed to show ordinary people that celebrities are just like us and make us feel better about ourselves. So there is a market for them. Heck back in the 1960s or 1970s Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton had their own photographer on the payroll taking causual photos of them when they were unaware that were then sold to the papers. Maybe that was done to give the movie audience the kind of photos they wanted without the paparazzi profitting from it? I did end up clicking the link to see the Linda photos everyone was talking about. I know I shouldn't have but I was curious. I didn't read the article though. I think Linda looks beautiful without make up and in glasses. She doesn't look her age and I do love her. I don't see how the paparazzi snapping photos of Linda doing grocery shopping is any different from them snapping photos of Patrick with his girlfriend the other week. I guess this means that they still consider Dallas to be newsworthy. But if the papers didn't buy the paparazzi photos and distribute them there would be no market for them. So yes do write the paper that we'd love to read a nice article about Linda with nice photos. Not these type of photos. I think this type of journalism that only writes nasty headlines to paparazzi photos are the worst kind that is giving the whole profession a bad rep. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Who played Sue Ellen in Dallas?