Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Karin" data-source="post: 301286" data-attributes="member: 57167">Wow! I didn&#039;t expect that post from Victoria talking about her &quot;Dallas family&quot;. But yes she did in deed defend Linda and also Patrick and everyone else of a certain age who have been stalked by the paparazzi and had their photos in the tabloids lately. She is spot on and maybe fans will listen to her and not buy those papers. <img src="https://smileyshack.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/shappy_clap_100-101.gif?w=150&amp;h=133"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":clap:" title="Clap&nbsp; &nbsp; :clap:" data-shortname=":clap:" />But like James pointed out, as long as people are buying the papers and clicks on the links nothing will change. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" />Also I don&#039;t really see how this behavior from the tabloids are any different from 20 -30 years ago when a lot of the legendary actors/actresses from the golden age of Hollywood were still with us. I remember seeing paparazzi photos of Katharine Hepburn, Elizabeth Taylor, Barbara Bel Geddes, Paul Newman and a lot of other aging&nbsp; actors and actresses who were 70 + in the papers back then. So maybe the only difference is that these days a lot more things happens online than 20 + years ago. Or have the tabloids really gotten meaner in their articles?Because if they haven&#039;t the only real difference is that a new generation is now the older generation that are being targetted in pretty much the same way as the generation before them were approx. 20 years ago!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Karin, post: 301286, member: 57167"] Wow! I didn't expect that post from Victoria talking about her "Dallas family". But yes she did in deed defend Linda and also Patrick and everyone else of a certain age who have been stalked by the paparazzi and had their photos in the tabloids lately. She is spot on and maybe fans will listen to her and not buy those papers. :clap: But like James pointed out, as long as people are buying the papers and clicks on the links nothing will change. :( Also I don't really see how this behavior from the tabloids are any different from 20 -30 years ago when a lot of the legendary actors/actresses from the golden age of Hollywood were still with us. I remember seeing paparazzi photos of Katharine Hepburn, Elizabeth Taylor, Barbara Bel Geddes, Paul Newman and a lot of other aging actors and actresses who were 70 + in the papers back then. So maybe the only difference is that these days a lot more things happens online than 20 + years ago. Or have the tabloids really gotten meaner in their articles? Because if they haven't the only real difference is that a new generation is now the older generation that are being targetted in pretty much the same way as the generation before them were approx. 20 years ago! [/QUOTE]

Verification

What month follows July?