Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="valkaren" data-source="post: 216287" data-attributes="member: 314">I love these James. I always remember your early threads covering Season 10, 11, 12 of Knots. Plus the amazing thread the A to Z of Knots Landing (or was it B to Z?), so I&#039;m happy to see you keeping the tradition alive!I wonder how much impact the episodes will continue to have you on watching them out of order. I always imagine Knots to be far more disorientating watching them out of order, not just because of the plots, but because some of the subtleties of the character beats / evolution may get lost if you just drop in on them as opposed to the other shows, plus particularly as the series shifted significantly in tone across the years. I never saw Dallas, but I always imagined it to be a far more satisfying episodic show then Knots where you instinctively know the key players and their positions without much need for the specific delicacies. But, having not seen Dallas, what do I know!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="valkaren, post: 216287, member: 314"] I love these James. I always remember your early threads covering Season 10, 11, 12 of Knots. Plus the amazing thread the A to Z of Knots Landing (or was it B to Z?), so I'm happy to see you keeping the tradition alive! I wonder how much impact the episodes will continue to have you on watching them out of order. I always imagine Knots to be far more disorientating watching them out of order, not just because of the plots, but because some of the subtleties of the character beats / evolution may get lost if you just drop in on them as opposed to the other shows, plus particularly as the series shifted significantly in tone across the years. I never saw Dallas, but I always imagined it to be a far more satisfying episodic show then Knots where you instinctively know the key players and their positions without much need for the specific delicacies. But, having not seen Dallas, what do I know! [/QUOTE]

Verification

6 + 4 =