Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Dynasty
Dynasty
Season 8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarky Oracle!" data-source="post: 439259" data-attributes="member: 57984"><p>Moving the focus "to the younger characters" is an old trope, and it rarely works. (CBS demanded DALLAS do the same for S13, and, as per usual, it failed miserably).</p><p></p><p>The misperception that DYNASTY had overdone the Krystle/Alexis/Blake triangle (something sometimes reiterated even by fans even today) came from the constant sense that this was the core of the show -- only the writers never really treated it that way after Season 2.. You were always waiting for something to happen there which rarely ever did).</p><p></p><p>In fact, they actually <em>underplayed</em> this angle, largely because they lost interest in Krystle, turning her into a passive, reactive character. (As a result, many viewers now describe Krystle as the character they hated the <strong><em>most</em></strong> -- and that's just something that should never have happened).</p><p></p><p>But the fans and the press understood what DYNASTY could/should be in a way the producers didn't.</p><p></p><p>About Season 8, Esther said, "That was then, this is now," contrasting DYNASTY with a new project they were involved in (the Suzanne Pleshette hospital slutty nurse show?). Shapiro later asserted that if she could do DYNASTY over again, she'd focus more on the younger characters in the later seasons -- apparently unaware that they did). Diahann Carroll later observed that this shift in focus helped kill DYNASTY.</p><p></p><p>As I say, the negligence by the usual suspects helped Season 8.</p><p></p><p><img src="https://i.gifer.com/NT7h.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="width: 761px" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarky Oracle!, post: 439259, member: 57984"] Moving the focus "to the younger characters" is an old trope, and it rarely works. (CBS demanded DALLAS do the same for S13, and, as per usual, it failed miserably). The misperception that DYNASTY had overdone the Krystle/Alexis/Blake triangle (something sometimes reiterated even by fans even today) came from the constant sense that this was the core of the show -- only the writers never really treated it that way after Season 2.. You were always waiting for something to happen there which rarely ever did). In fact, they actually [I]underplayed[/I] this angle, largely because they lost interest in Krystle, turning her into a passive, reactive character. (As a result, many viewers now describe Krystle as the character they hated the [B][I]most[/I][/B] -- and that's just something that should never have happened). But the fans and the press understood what DYNASTY could/should be in a way the producers didn't. About Season 8, Esther said, "That was then, this is now," contrasting DYNASTY with a new project they were involved in (the Suzanne Pleshette hospital slutty nurse show?). Shapiro later asserted that if she could do DYNASTY over again, she'd focus more on the younger characters in the later seasons -- apparently unaware that they did). Diahann Carroll later observed that this shift in focus helped kill DYNASTY. As I say, the negligence by the usual suspects helped Season 8. [IMG width="761px"]https://i.gifer.com/NT7h.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What month follows July?
Post reply
Forums
Dynasty
Dynasty
Season 8
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top