Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Global Telly Talk
Classic UK TV
The Great British Sitcom
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mel O&#039;Drama" data-source="post: 383534" data-attributes="member: 23"><p>Well, today I finished the entire run of small screen <em>On The Buses.</em></p><p></p><p>It truly was a trudge to get through Series Seven, and the fare for that last mile was paid entirely with goodwill that came from any remaining familiarity. Recycled plots, scenarios and lines only served to remind the viewer of the series as it was during peak hour.</p><p></p><p>The absences needn't have so detrimentally affected the series, but there was nothing to fill the void left by them.</p><p></p><p>There wasn't really a point in the last half a dozen episodes where I actually missed Reg Varney and his regular glances to the audience and camera (both of which betrayed his music hall background, I'd say). But I still quickly grew to resent the remaining cast being simultaneously stretched too thin and overused. By which I mean that their deficiencies and limitations were very quickly exposed. I realise this is repeating what I'd already said in an earlier Series Seven post, but it really was taken to the limits when we were stuck with just four characters for each of the 25 minutes.</p><p></p><p>Blakey's gurning and moaning (and Stephen Lewis's overacting) were already testing me, but I ended up feeling relieved whenever he wasn't on-screen (which wasn't often considering he became the series' new lead and featured in almost all the scenes both at the depot and the Butler home into which he'd moved as a lodger before Stan had even departed.</p><p></p><p>While ways were found to keep the depot and the occasional bus in the picture, the dynamics changed there, and most were for the worse. Without the peer pressure and enabling of Stan, Jack felt like even more of a wide boy and none too likeable for it. By series' end his underhanded stuff was so blatant it didn't make any sense even for this world.</p><p></p><p>Olive's daftness was borderline endearing in earlier series. With Arthur gone she became even more of a caricature while also giving her significantly more screen time and it was no longer endearing. At all. Olive as a clippie simply didn't work for me, and at home she became ridiculously brainless and clumsy while grinning cheekily. While there were one or two smiles raised, overall I grew to find her a pain.</p><p></p><p>This leaves Mabel as perhaps the most consistently watchable in this final run. But watching her fuss and cluck round Blakey had very little appeal. And the less said about the episode where she and Olive fought over Blakey, each believing the tea leaves told them he was Mr Right, the better.</p><p></p><p>The bottom line for me is that while the series might have been buried with Stan's departure, it had actually died when Arthur left (having flatlined some while before that... probably when the writing duties changed hands). Admittedly, he was a favourite character for me almost from the start, but his absence really proved how important his cynicism and conflict was for the series. There were attempts at keeping both these elements with other characters, but it ultimately felt too manufactured and unnatural.</p><p></p><p>The final episode was an example of this. It was the old sitcom standard where feuding neighbours battle to get the best garden to win a competition, resorting to sabotaging the other's efforts. Hilarity ensues. But the "neighbours" in this case were Jack and Blakey. Technically this was fine, since Jack was established as renting a room very close by the Butlers' house well before Blakey got anywhere near it. Problem is, it has very little to do with the series' premise. It could easily have been an episode of <em>Terry & June </em>or<em> Never The Twain </em>or something. Shoehorning in the "bus" theme by having the general manager judging the competition doesn't really fly. As a one-off this would have been fine earlier in the run, but here the series has lost enough of what makes it<em> On The Buses </em>for it to feel lazy and generic.</p><p></p><p>There are saving graces in these latter episodes. The aforementioned general manager is played by Michael Sheard, best remembered by me (and many, I would think) as <em>Grange Hill's</em> scary Mr Bronson (he also played Hitler five times, including that brief face-to-face moment in one of the<em> Indiana Jones</em> films). Given the material here, there's no danger of him setting the screen alight, but he's a welcome addition all the same. Likewise, it's lovely to see Yootha Joyce, almost immediately before going on to national treasure status as Mildred Roper.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mel O'Drama, post: 383534, member: 23"] Well, today I finished the entire run of small screen [I]On The Buses.[/I] It truly was a trudge to get through Series Seven, and the fare for that last mile was paid entirely with goodwill that came from any remaining familiarity. Recycled plots, scenarios and lines only served to remind the viewer of the series as it was during peak hour. The absences needn't have so detrimentally affected the series, but there was nothing to fill the void left by them. There wasn't really a point in the last half a dozen episodes where I actually missed Reg Varney and his regular glances to the audience and camera (both of which betrayed his music hall background, I'd say). But I still quickly grew to resent the remaining cast being simultaneously stretched too thin and overused. By which I mean that their deficiencies and limitations were very quickly exposed. I realise this is repeating what I'd already said in an earlier Series Seven post, but it really was taken to the limits when we were stuck with just four characters for each of the 25 minutes. Blakey's gurning and moaning (and Stephen Lewis's overacting) were already testing me, but I ended up feeling relieved whenever he wasn't on-screen (which wasn't often considering he became the series' new lead and featured in almost all the scenes both at the depot and the Butler home into which he'd moved as a lodger before Stan had even departed. While ways were found to keep the depot and the occasional bus in the picture, the dynamics changed there, and most were for the worse. Without the peer pressure and enabling of Stan, Jack felt like even more of a wide boy and none too likeable for it. By series' end his underhanded stuff was so blatant it didn't make any sense even for this world. Olive's daftness was borderline endearing in earlier series. With Arthur gone she became even more of a caricature while also giving her significantly more screen time and it was no longer endearing. At all. Olive as a clippie simply didn't work for me, and at home she became ridiculously brainless and clumsy while grinning cheekily. While there were one or two smiles raised, overall I grew to find her a pain. This leaves Mabel as perhaps the most consistently watchable in this final run. But watching her fuss and cluck round Blakey had very little appeal. And the less said about the episode where she and Olive fought over Blakey, each believing the tea leaves told them he was Mr Right, the better. The bottom line for me is that while the series might have been buried with Stan's departure, it had actually died when Arthur left (having flatlined some while before that... probably when the writing duties changed hands). Admittedly, he was a favourite character for me almost from the start, but his absence really proved how important his cynicism and conflict was for the series. There were attempts at keeping both these elements with other characters, but it ultimately felt too manufactured and unnatural. The final episode was an example of this. It was the old sitcom standard where feuding neighbours battle to get the best garden to win a competition, resorting to sabotaging the other's efforts. Hilarity ensues. But the "neighbours" in this case were Jack and Blakey. Technically this was fine, since Jack was established as renting a room very close by the Butlers' house well before Blakey got anywhere near it. Problem is, it has very little to do with the series' premise. It could easily have been an episode of [I]Terry & June [/I]or[I] Never The Twain [/I]or something. Shoehorning in the "bus" theme by having the general manager judging the competition doesn't really fly. As a one-off this would have been fine earlier in the run, but here the series has lost enough of what makes it[I] On The Buses [/I]for it to feel lazy and generic. There are saving graces in these latter episodes. The aforementioned general manager is played by Michael Sheard, best remembered by me (and many, I would think) as [I]Grange Hill's[/I] scary Mr Bronson (he also played Hitler five times, including that brief face-to-face moment in one of the[I] Indiana Jones[/I] films). Given the material here, there's no danger of him setting the screen alight, but he's a welcome addition all the same. Likewise, it's lovely to see Yootha Joyce, almost immediately before going on to national treasure status as Mildred Roper. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who played Sue Ellen in Dallas?
Post reply
Forums
Global Telly Talk
Classic UK TV
The Great British Sitcom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top