Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Dallas the TV series
Dallas - The Original Series
There was no need for the Jason retcon
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chris2" data-source="post: 340693" data-attributes="member: 495"><p>In the miniseries, it was established that Jock and Digger were business partners. They discovered oil, and Jock registered the claim in his name only, in order to prevent Digger from gambling away his half of the business. Digger misunderstood Jock’s intentions and went after him with a gun. Jock, enraged, decided to keep the whole business for himself.</p><p></p><p>From a legal standpoint, Jock had no right to decide himself to cut Digger out of the business. If Cliff had written documentation of their partnership, he could have brought the case to court. That could have been a compelling storyline in itself. The show was careful to have us root for the Ewings, but in reality, the Barnes family had some claim to the business.</p><p></p><p>Where I live, there was a case about two different branches of a family fighting over a supermarket chain. The judge ruled branch 1 had cheated branch 2 out of their portion of the business, and awarded them controlling interest (51%). You could see something similar happen with Ewing Oil.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chris2, post: 340693, member: 495"] In the miniseries, it was established that Jock and Digger were business partners. They discovered oil, and Jock registered the claim in his name only, in order to prevent Digger from gambling away his half of the business. Digger misunderstood Jock’s intentions and went after him with a gun. Jock, enraged, decided to keep the whole business for himself. From a legal standpoint, Jock had no right to decide himself to cut Digger out of the business. If Cliff had written documentation of their partnership, he could have brought the case to court. That could have been a compelling storyline in itself. The show was careful to have us root for the Ewings, but in reality, the Barnes family had some claim to the business. Where I live, there was a case about two different branches of a family fighting over a supermarket chain. The judge ruled branch 1 had cheated branch 2 out of their portion of the business, and awarded them controlling interest (51%). You could see something similar happen with Ewing Oil. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who played Sue Ellen in Dallas?
Post reply
Forums
Dallas the TV series
Dallas - The Original Series
There was no need for the Jason retcon
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top