Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ome" data-source="post: 27955" data-attributes="member: 2">1.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Mitch Cooper – I found him highly annoying, especially when it involved money.2.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Mark Graison – An odd one because he annoyed me for been too good to be true.3.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Tommy Mckay – I loathe characters that take drugs.4.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Jeannie O&#039;Brien – Grasping at straws with this Pam look-a-like.5.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Charlie Wade – Just the moaning was enough to make me roll my eyes when she was on the screen.6.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Leslie Stewart – I never took to her character or the story.7.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Vanessa Beaumont – I didn’t particular find her back story convincing.8.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Laurel Ellis – I simply found her boring.9.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Don Lockwood – I can’t even remember why I didn’t like him, but I know I didn’t.10.&nbsp; Andrew Dowling – Another character (like Laurel) that had zero chemistry with the screen.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ome, post: 27955, member: 2"] 1. Mitch Cooper – I found him highly annoying, especially when it involved money. 2. Mark Graison – An odd one because he annoyed me for been too good to be true. 3. Tommy Mckay – I loathe characters that take drugs. 4. Jeannie O'Brien – Grasping at straws with this Pam look-a-like. 5. Charlie Wade – Just the moaning was enough to make me roll my eyes when she was on the screen. 6. Leslie Stewart – I never took to her character or the story. 7. Vanessa Beaumont – I didn’t particular find her back story convincing. 8. Laurel Ellis – I simply found her boring. 9. Don Lockwood – I can’t even remember why I didn’t like him, but I know I didn’t. 10. Andrew Dowling – Another character (like Laurel) that had zero chemistry with the screen. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What month follows July?

A little forum update...We're planning an upgrade.

Find out more about what's planned and how you can help support the forum

Reply to thread