A little forum update...We're planning an upgrade.

Find out more about what's planned and how you can help support the forum
Click here for the details

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="LMLDallas78" data-source="post: 387648" data-attributes="member: 55682">That's the burning question that was never totally resolved.One would assume not, not at the time anyway before we knew about Digger not being the Daddy. No tests were carried out on Cliff and Pam only a little history and they "were lucky" as it missed those two.We can assume that's correct, but there was a risk of carrying to full term as well as losing a child within the first year.We can now assume Pam had tests which would by now be somewhat more advanced and was told there was no reason why she wouldn't naturally carry a child to term. Wasn't she returning from the doctors before her accident?So much of that story was simply left out and forgotten about. There were plenty of dramatic storylines where Pam could have had a baby or even just normal storylines.<img src="https://smileyshack.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/smileyslaughing_lol_hehe_100-102.gif?w=145&h=150"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":giggle:" title="Giggle    :giggle:" data-shortname=":giggle:" />The more advanced tests as I mentioned above is all I can think and she was was probably mentally ready now and not so terrified of miscarriage.</blockquote>