Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bobby Southworth" data-source="post: 342643" data-attributes="member: 4960"><p>Bobby should have been written to care. Plain and simple. That would have changed so much. As others have pointed out, Katherine, as he saw her for himself at the hospital could have been responsible.&nbsp; As I&#039;ve also said, I wouldn&#039;t have had as much of a problem with a recast either, than what we got, but I wouldn&#039;t have killed her off. I think fans wanted more than just a one season reunion between the two, and if Victoria wanted out, I don&#039;t see anything wrong with it.&nbsp; Donna Reed didn&#039;t work for the reasons I brought up in my earlier post.&nbsp; Margaret Michaels at least looked something like VP, and had she acted and emoted in the same way, I think it possibly could have worked and been believable. No, she wasn&#039;t Victoria, but VP didn&#039;t die and wasn&#039;t forced out. That&#039;s part of why I think a recast would have been acceptable in this case.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Bobby Southworth, post: 342643, member: 4960"] Bobby should have been written to care. Plain and simple. That would have changed so much. As others have pointed out, Katherine, as he saw her for himself at the hospital could have been responsible. As I've also said, I wouldn't have had as much of a problem with a recast either, than what we got, but I wouldn't have killed her off. I think fans wanted more than just a one season reunion between the two, and if Victoria wanted out, I don't see anything wrong with it. Donna Reed didn't work for the reasons I brought up in my earlier post. Margaret Michaels at least looked something like VP, and had she acted and emoted in the same way, I think it possibly could have worked and been believable. No, she wasn't Victoria, but VP didn't die and wasn't forced out. That's part of why I think a recast would have been acceptable in this case. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What month follows July?