Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DallasFanForever" data-source="post: 334295" data-attributes="member: 13221"><p>In retrospect, I think they made a mistake by saying the xrays, injuries, bullet wounds, etc were a perfect match. They were probably better off saying the injuries COULD’VE been the same person but it was inconclusive. From what I understand no two people’s xrays could be identical so they should’ve given a better explanation if they were trying to keep things ambiguous. They did a better job with the lie detector test. At the time those weren’t always known to be 100% accurate and they gave the explanation that he could pass it even if he wasn’t Jock but thought he was. So I think the ambiguity was better handled with the polygraph than it was the injuries.</p></blockquote><p></p>