Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Angela Channing" data-source="post: 323422" data-attributes="member: 33">I used to think Nan was hilarious which was why I wanted to see this film but it just wasn&#039;t very good. There wasn&#039;t as many f**ks in the film as I expected which I think was probably more to avoid a 18 certificate (the film has a 15 certificate) and the word c**t appeared on screen quite a few times although I don&#039;t think it was actually said. I don&#039;t think making changes to be more acceptable for a modern cinema audience was the problem, it was the awful plot which involved getting Nan involved in a succession of stupid adventures. The best bits of the film were not the comedy but the drama between Nan and her sister and her sister&#039;s husband which was even a bit moving on occasions. You mentioned Janice and Ray and perhaps the film might have worked better had some of the other characters from The Catherine Tate Show appeared in some of the scenes.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Angela Channing, post: 323422, member: 33"] I used to think Nan was hilarious which was why I wanted to see this film but it just wasn't very good. There wasn't as many f**ks in the film as I expected which I think was probably more to avoid a 18 certificate (the film has a 15 certificate) and the word c**t appeared on screen quite a few times although I don't think it was actually said. I don't think making changes to be more acceptable for a modern cinema audience was the problem, it was the awful plot which involved getting Nan involved in a succession of stupid adventures. The best bits of the film were not the comedy but the drama between Nan and her sister and her sister's husband which was even a bit moving on occasions. You mentioned Janice and Ray and perhaps the film might have worked better had some of the other characters from [I]The Catherine Tate Show[/I] appeared in some of the scenes. [/QUOTE]

Verification

6 + 4 =