Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Willie Oleson" data-source="post: 411520" data-attributes="member: 8">I didn&#039;t realise that the homosexual part of their relationship is factual, rather than something that could be &quot;interpreted as&quot;.Yes, as long as that feeling of guilt doesn&#039;t become too consuming. After all, the only way to get rid of the burden of guilt is to confess.I guess it&#039;s only Brandon&#039;s larger-than-life ego that prevents him from worrying about anything. Maybe the possibility of Phillip&#039;s unpredictable behaviour would add to the excitement of it all.I believe Brandon was the first one to bring up the subject of foul play connected with David&#039;s absence, there&#039;s a lot of teasing and flaunting that contradicts the desire to commit the perfect crime.On the other hand, that kind of bluff could also work as a smoke screen based on the idea that a true criminal would never implicate himself, let alone in such a cocky way.And that&#039;s what I meant with clashing themes. Is it the perfect crime and the joy of getting away with it in the most dangerous way, or is it about ridding population of its inferior or unwanted beings, as per professor Cadell&#039;s theory?Gosh, it feels like Barnabas and Julia Hoffman trying to make sense of the strange goings-on in Collinsport.And it would have looked so much better if it turned out that Brandon had planted&nbsp; the clue of the hat, just to make sure that Cadell wouldn&#039;t let it rest.Yes, they are to be watched in the foreseeable future, but not right now. I don&#039;t find Hitchcock very binge-watchable (and I&#039;m currently binging something else at the moment).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Willie Oleson, post: 411520, member: 8"] I didn't realise that the homosexual part of their relationship is factual, rather than something that could be "interpreted as". Yes, as long as that feeling of guilt doesn't become too consuming. After all, the only way to get rid of the burden of guilt is to confess. I guess it's only Brandon's larger-than-life ego that prevents him from worrying about anything. Maybe the possibility of Phillip's unpredictable behaviour would add to the excitement of it all. I believe Brandon was the first one to bring up the subject of foul play connected with David's absence, there's a lot of teasing and flaunting that contradicts the desire to commit the perfect crime. On the other hand, that kind of bluff could also work as a smoke screen based on the idea that a true criminal would never implicate himself, let alone in such a cocky way. And that's what I meant with clashing themes. Is it the perfect crime and the joy of getting away with it in the most dangerous way, or is it about ridding population of its inferior or unwanted beings, as per professor Cadell's theory? Gosh, it feels like Barnabas and Julia Hoffman trying to make sense of the strange goings-on in Collinsport. And it would have looked so much better if it turned out that Brandon[I] [/I]had [I]planted[/I] the clue of the hat, just to make sure that Cadell wouldn't let it rest. Yes, they are to be watched in the foreseeable future, but not right now. I don't find Hitchcock very binge-watchable (and I'm currently binging something else at the moment). [/QUOTE]

Verification

6 + 4 =