Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Dynasty
CW Dynasty
Who do you think started the fire?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zable" data-source="post: 119910" data-attributes="member: 47"><p>[USER=54]@Ked[/USER] Re: How Season 2 handles the continuation.....It's anybody's guess. Season 2 could start off at a later point and harken back to Stable-house Inferno night in conversations, and not show flashbacks. </p><p></p><p>I've not watched the series, only seen clips. I've read that cwDynasty has used flashbacks, but I don't know how they used those flashbacks. Don't know if there was a specific purpose to them.</p><p></p><p>In Gran Hotel, the flashbacks were its most unique feature, I thought, because they acted as the truth monitor. In the beginning viewers don't notice this aspect -- we think the flashback complements the current scene in the present. Like, someone reads a letter and the flashbacks show at the same time for a visual filling in of the details. Then gradually we notice that the flashbacks don't seem to be presenting the same picture. Someone could be saying something like "My boss was a stern man, I was a little afraid of him when I met him" but the flashbacks could show that there was a little flirtation in their encounter. The flashbacks gradually change to the point that when there is a startling difference in what's being described in the present and what's being shown in the flashback, we believe the flashback. Then there's a twist to the flashbacks: one person says something in the present but the flashbacks show what somebody else says, and viewers are left wondering who among the lot are speaking true and this is when story details mentioned episodes back come into play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zable, post: 119910, member: 47"] [USER=54]@Ked[/USER] Re: How Season 2 handles the continuation.....It's anybody's guess. Season 2 could start off at a later point and harken back to Stable-house Inferno night in conversations, and not show flashbacks. I've not watched the series, only seen clips. I've read that cwDynasty has used flashbacks, but I don't know how they used those flashbacks. Don't know if there was a specific purpose to them. In Gran Hotel, the flashbacks were its most unique feature, I thought, because they acted as the truth monitor. In the beginning viewers don't notice this aspect -- we think the flashback complements the current scene in the present. Like, someone reads a letter and the flashbacks show at the same time for a visual filling in of the details. Then gradually we notice that the flashbacks don't seem to be presenting the same picture. Someone could be saying something like "My boss was a stern man, I was a little afraid of him when I met him" but the flashbacks could show that there was a little flirtation in their encounter. The flashbacks gradually change to the point that when there is a startling difference in what's being described in the present and what's being shown in the flashback, we believe the flashback. Then there's a twist to the flashbacks: one person says something in the present but the flashbacks show what somebody else says, and viewers are left wondering who among the lot are speaking true and this is when story details mentioned episodes back come into play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
6 + 4 =
Post reply
Forums
Dynasty
CW Dynasty
Who do you think started the fire?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top