Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Willie Oleson" data-source="post: 82120" data-attributes="member: 8">I think most Dynasty viewers. And most of them willl remember Krystle and Alexis and maybe Blake too. And that&#039;s it.Sure, everything is possible. A good script + good production + good cast = good show.But how to make that &quot;Dynasty&quot;? What is Dynasty&#039;s legacy? Some boring company that was the center of the show in name only, some names of children and grandchildren nobody remembers (Lucas, who? Danny, who?) and no actors available to reprise their iconic roles. Unless, all of a sudden, we&#039;re John James and Jack Coleman&#039;s biggest fans. Perhaps Catherine Oxenberg could be in it too.There was no land or sense of place so it won&#039;t feel like &quot;returning to&quot;.All in all, it&#039;s not a very exciting concept.But I would definitely support a sequel of DYNASTY II - THE COLBYS.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Willie Oleson, post: 82120, member: 8"] I think [B]most[/B] Dynasty viewers. And most of them willl remember Krystle and Alexis and maybe Blake too. And that's it. Sure, everything is possible. A good script + good production + good cast = good show. But how to make that "Dynasty"? What is Dynasty's legacy? Some boring company that was the center of the show in name only, some names of children and grandchildren nobody remembers (Lucas, who? Danny, who?) and [B]no [/B]actors available to reprise their iconic roles. Unless, all of a sudden, we're John James and Jack Coleman's biggest fans. Perhaps Catherine Oxenberg could be in it too. There was no land or sense of place so it won't feel like "returning to". All in all, it's not a very exciting concept. But I would definitely support a sequel of DYNASTY II - THE COLBYS. [/QUOTE]

Verification

6 + 4 =