Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Dynasty
CW Dynasty
Why they rebooted, insted of a continuation.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AndyLaird" data-source="post: 87104" data-attributes="member: 678"><p>The unspoken reason why it's not a continuation may be that if it were, there would be considerable pressure to use the surviving actors. And, whilst they are still a fine-looking body of men and women, many of them don't really look like the cast of a modern-day primetime network show - which the CW will fear would affect ratings in its target demographic.</p><p></p><p>I think not doing it as a continuation is a huge missed opportunity, but I wouldn't have had a problem with recasts.</p><p></p><p>*ducks for cover*</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AndyLaird, post: 87104, member: 678"] The unspoken reason why it's not a continuation may be that if it were, there would be considerable pressure to use the surviving actors. And, whilst they are still a fine-looking body of men and women, many of them don't really look like the cast of a modern-day primetime network show - which the CW will fear would affect ratings in its target demographic. I think not doing it as a continuation is a huge missed opportunity, but I wouldn't have had a problem with recasts. *ducks for cover* [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
6 + 4 =
Post reply
Forums
Dynasty
CW Dynasty
Why they rebooted, insted of a continuation.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top