Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kenny Coyote" data-source="post: 197582" data-attributes="member: 102">Rove, I didn&#039;t quote you. Did you see any quotation marks?However, I do remember doing everything I could to make sure I was correctly understanding what you meant. Do you remember reading the post with the following quote?You replied to the first sentence in the above quote and to one other quote from my reply to you. This was your reply to me:I didn&#039;t know why you&#039;d reply to me in that way, so I replied with this post:You couldn&#039;t be bothered to acknowledge my response to you. I don&#039;t know what more anyone could have done.&nbsp; So, I find it amazing that after you couldn&#039;t even be bothered to acknowledge that response in any way, that you think I&#039;m being unfair to you.I gave you the perfect opportunity to say why you think it was Larry Hagman&#039;s fault that Patrick Duffy got rehired. You chose not to, but now you&#039;re complaining that I misunderstood you, that you didn&#039;t blame Larry Hagman. It sure looked like you blamed him to me. Remember when I said I don&#039;t think shouting back one word responses is conducive to a good conversation? This is a good example of why that is.I don&#039;t know I could have addressed you in a nicer, more polite way. Since there must be some reason why you would respond to me in such a rude way, I thought the best thing to do was to explain the reason you were apparently angry at me as soon as possible, so we would have the chance to clear the air between us. If you&#039;d prefer to discuss this by private message, that&#039;s fine with me. Either way you prefer is fine with me because as far as I&#039;m concerned, it would be a whole lot better for us and for the forum as a whole to not have this thing go on any longer. I don&#039;t even know what your problem with me was to begin with. I can&#039;t very well address an issue if I don&#039;t know what it is, can I? Don&#039;t you think it would make more sense to settle the issue soon rather than just letting it fester?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kenny Coyote, post: 197582, member: 102"] Rove, I didn't quote you. Did you see any quotation marks? However, I do remember doing everything I could to make sure I was correctly understanding what you meant. Do you remember reading the post with the following quote? You replied to the first sentence in the above quote and to one other quote from my reply to you. This was your reply to me: I didn't know why you'd reply to me in that way, so I replied with this post: You couldn't be bothered to acknowledge my response to you. I don't know what more anyone could have done. So, I find it amazing that after you couldn't even be bothered to acknowledge that response in any way, that you think I'm being unfair to you. I gave you the perfect opportunity to say why you think it was Larry Hagman's fault that Patrick Duffy got rehired. You chose not to, but now you're complaining that I misunderstood you, that you didn't blame Larry Hagman. It sure looked like you blamed him to me. Remember when I said I don't think shouting back one word responses is conducive to a good conversation? This is a good example of why that is. I don't know I could have addressed you in a nicer, more polite way. Since there must be some reason why you would respond to me in such a rude way, I thought the best thing to do was to explain the reason you were apparently angry at me as soon as possible, so we would have the chance to clear the air between us. If you'd prefer to discuss this by private message, that's fine with me. Either way you prefer is fine with me because as far as I'm concerned, it would be a whole lot better for us and for the forum as a whole to not have this thing go on any longer. I don't even know what your problem with me was to begin with. I can't very well address an issue if I don't know what it is, can I? Don't you think it would make more sense to settle the issue soon rather than just letting it fester? [/QUOTE]

Verification

What month follows July?