That is certainly disappointing. I was looking forward to seeing this series.I watched the first two installments and was very disappointed, it only skimmed the surface when it could have dug deeper. A casual viewer of classic TV would not come away learning anything new from this. The "Rural Purge" was briefly mentioned when it easily could have been the topic of an entire episode. They mentioned that Ann and Donald on That Girl had to have a chaste relationship but failed to mention that in the original pilot Donald was Ann's agent which made test audiences uncomfortable as they equated it with him being her pimp! Despite being "woke" they failed to address anti-Semitism which could have been covered in the portion about That Girl: Harold Gould played Ann's father in the pilot but ABC thought he was "too New York" (code for "too Jewish") and insisted the part be recast.
Overall, I got the impression this was produced by millennials for millennials. If you have never watched a TV series produced prior to 2000 you might learn something from this but anyone else should skip it.
I watched the first two installments and was very disappointed, it only skimmed the surface when it could have dug deeper. A casual viewer of classic TV would not come away learning anything new from this. The "Rural Purge" was briefly mentioned when it easily could have been the topic of an entire episode. They mentioned that Ann and Donald on That Girl had to have a chaste relationship but failed to mention that in the original pilot Donald was Ann's agent which made test audiences uncomfortable as they equated it with him being her pimp! Despite being "woke" they failed to address anti-Semitism which could have been covered in the portion about That Girl: Harold Gould played Ann's father in the pilot but ABC thought he was "too New York" (code for "too Jewish") and insisted the part be recast.
Overall, I got the impression this was produced by millennials for millennials. If you have never watched a TV series produced prior to 2000 you might learn something from this but anyone else should skip it.
I watched the first two installments and was very disappointed, it only skimmed the surface when it could have dug deeper. A casual viewer of classic TV would not come away learning anything new from this. The "Rural Purge" was briefly mentioned when it easily could have been the topic of an entire episode. They mentioned that Ann and Donald on That Girl had to have a chaste relationship but failed to mention that in the original pilot Donald was Ann's agent which made test audiences uncomfortable as they equated it with him being her pimp! Despite being "woke" they failed to address anti-Semitism which could have been covered in the portion about That Girl: Harold Gould played Ann's father in the pilot but ABC thought he was "too New York" (code for "too Jewish") and insisted the part be recast.
Overall, I got the impression this was produced by millennials for millennials. If you have never watched a TV series produced prior to 2000 you might learn something from this but anyone else should skip it.
It covers classic sitcoms but in the most superficial way possible: Did you know that Happy Days was set in the 1950s? Or that all of the main cast members on What's Happening!! were Black? If you've been in a coma for the past 70 years or just arrived on Earth from an alien planet you'll find it informative, otherwise there is nothing new here - absolutely nothing.So basically, it's more about the sitcoms of the 2000s (now) than anything else, I take it?
It definitely is woke. Completely, insufferably woke.What else would you expect from CNN?
As soon as I saw the poster and realized Roseanne is not in it, I knew what kind of woke trash this is.....
The minute I saw this was broken into theme episodes ("Facing Race", "Sex & The Sitcom") -- rather than a chronological history of the genre -- I lost all interest. That not only guaranteed this project would be agenda driven, but that they clearly wanted to avoid spending too much time on those pesky older shows which would have been unavoidable if they had gone decade-by-decade.
Hard pass.
Baiting the audience with the title?Then why would they call it History of the Sitcom, if it wasn't all that much of one?
They probably had a staff meeting where they discussed ideas for shows: they wanted something cheap that used existing footage. Someone suggested a show about classic sitcoms. They approved the idea and turned it over to a team of producers. The producers decided they would use the show as a means to dismantle the patriarchy, disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure and embrace equity and diversity.Then why would they call it History of the Sitcom, if it wasn't all that much of one?
I'm not doubting you, but how do you know "too New York" was code for "too Jewish?"I watched the first two installments and was very disappointed, it only skimmed the surface when it could have dug deeper. A casual viewer of classic TV would not come away learning anything new from this. The "Rural Purge" was briefly mentioned when it easily could have been the topic of an entire episode. They mentioned that Ann and Donald on That Girl had to have a chaste relationship but failed to mention that in the original pilot Donald was Ann's agent which made test audiences uncomfortable as they equated it with him being her pimp! Despite being "woke" they failed to address anti-Semitism which could have been covered in the portion about That Girl: Harold Gould played Ann's father in the pilot but ABC thought he was "too New York" (code for "too Jewish") and insisted the part be recast.
Overall, I got the impression this was produced by millennials for millennials. If you have never watched a TV series produced prior to 2000 you might learn something from this but anyone else should skip it.
Maybe I'm just now noticing something that everyone already knew, but this "woke" generation seems to think no societal struggles occurred until they were born--i.e. acting as if their pet causes like gay rights, environmentalism, and civil rights were not being fought for until they came along to "invent" them. It's really annoying to see them dismiss anyone else's efforts previous to theirs as if they did not matter.It definitely is woke. Completely, insufferably woke.
"Too New York" was apparently one of several phrases used in "polite company" instead of terms that were openly anti-Semitic, racist, homophobic, etc. That Girl and Rhoda may have only been 8 years apart but television changed quite a but within that time: All In The Family and M*A*S*H proved that a TV series could be socially conscious and still get good ratings. That Girl was a new series with new characters while Rhoda was a spin-off featuring a very popular character; Valerie Harper won three Emmy Awards for her performance on The Mary Tyler Moore Show (she would win a fourth for Rhoda). Rhoda's Jewishness was already established so her family also being Jewish was a foregone conclusion.I'm not doubting you, but how do you know "too New York" was code for "too Jewish?"
Harold Gould would later appear in a recurring role on "Rhoda," in which the main characters were Jewish.
Again, I'm not doubting you, I'm just curious about it, and how one sitcom can't be too ethnic, but another one can.
I had never heard of the show so I did a quick Wikipedia search, and for what it's worth, according to Wikipedia the outcries came from Orthodox Jews. I'm not saying there wasn’t and isn't antisemitism,but I don't think that would count here. At least, based on this information."Too New York" was apparently one of several phrases used in "polite company" instead of terms that were openly anti-Semitic, racist, homophobic, etc. That Girl and Rhoda may have only been 8 years apart but television changed quite a but within that time: All In The Family and M*A*S*H proved that a TV series could be socially conscious and still get good ratings. That Girl was a new series with new characters while Rhoda was a spin-off featuring a very popular character; Valerie Harper won three Emmy Awards for her performance on The Mary Tyler Moore Show (she would win a fourth for Rhoda). Rhoda's Jewishness was already established so her family also being Jewish was a foregone conclusion.
There was still plenty of anti-Semitism in the mid 70s: Bridget Loves Bernie depicted a marriage between a Jewish man and an Irish Catholic woman, it was the 5th highest rated show for the 1972-73 season. Despite its high ratings, CBS cancelled Bridget Loves Bernie after receiving viewer complaints about the depiction of an inter-faith marriage.
You’re close! It was actually called Chicken Soup. As to why it didn’t last, there were apparently a number of reasons. Jackie was under fire from some of the Jewish organizations around the country for the stereotypes he portrayed on the show. And then he got in some hot water for alleged racial remarks he made about NYC Mayor David Dinkins during his campaign, comments he claimed were taken out of context. The show was considered a decent hit up to that point, but the ratings weren’t what ABC had hoped for, especially considering it was in the time slot right after ROSEANNE. And after Jackie’s controversial remarks the ratings got even worse so they pulled the plug after only seven episodes.Jackie Mason had a short-lived sitcom with a similar premise, believe called Chicken Soul, Lynne Redgrave was the costar. I don't know why it didn't last.
I just saw that. Odd coincidence indeedOdd coincidence: Jackie Mason died today.
He voiced Krusty's father in the Simpsons.Odd coincidence: Jackie Mason died today.