- Awards
- 27
Yes!
They did a nice job of quietly turning them into actual characters - something that isn't always accomplished in like situations.Bobby and Betsy celebrate their third birthday on KNOTS where the most notable gifts they receive are from the show’s writers — scripted dialogue and a matching pair of goofy personalities. Their refusal to sit still for Goomah’s camera during their party immediately marks them out as less compliant than either of their DALLAS cousins or their DYNASTY counterparts.
Yes, quiet as a mouse....It wasn't until Olivia's drug story that they managed to give Brian Cunningham much of a personality, and even then he was not what one would call a well-rounded character.
we all know that Knots Landing is the world’s most perfect community, I mean a veritable utopia, the solar system’s ideal community, but Laura left here to die.”
However, underneath all their “bad” behaviour and self-indulgences lie some basic human fears (fear of death, fear of facing the end alone — hell, the fear of being abruptly written out of a hit TV series after nearly two-hundred episodes), which suggests that, deep down, they are just like us. Well, kind of.
Not only is Laura corporally absent, but this is the very first week Constance McCashin has not appeared in the show’s opening credits.
Of course the prevailing wisdom seems these days to be that they did this because they just wanted to be rid of the character and/or the actress, and this "choice to leave" was just their way of getting it done quickest while denying CM the opportunity to act the hell out of a longer, terminal illness plotline before her departure.I'm sure she would have done a great job, but personally I'm not eager to watch a long, slow cancer-death.while denying CM the opportunity to act the hell out of a longer, terminal illness plotline before her departure
Isn't it typical of Knots Landing to do something that could be questioned or frowned upon by the audience, and then have their characters frown upon that very same issue albeit from a story's point of view? And then even manage to make it look good?The decision was all forced by budget cuts and writer's decisions. But Richard bringing it out in the open
That plot hole was kind of the weak point of this episode. We all knew that Laura wouldn't really have left them all to die - it went against her instincts as a mother, wife and friend to her neighbors.
With the sudden departure of two such iconic characters - Lilimae and Laura, the viewers also felt that fear for the future of their show. If these two have really gone, could Abby, Karen or Val really be next?
denying CM the opportunity to act the hell out of a longer, terminal illness plotline before her departure.
'm sure she would have done a great job, but personally I'm not eager to watch a long, slow cancer-death.
I don't mind crying a little (or a lot) when I watch my stories, and the whole implication of her departure and how it was done was sad enough imo.
But when it's so overwhelmingly sad and depressing it could even take the melodrama out of it. I like the sad moments ,but dying of cancer is too much of a process and I'd end up waiting for that final moment.
And it looked as if it was filmed in a tiny corner of the studio, sort of a small hobby theater for the local town's folk. That itself may be a charming idea except that I'm pretty sure that was not how it was supposed to look.eagerly overacting extras, silly costumes, stilted dialogue and a general sense of forced gaiety
Then at least you got something out of it.For some reason, however, it made me laugh all the way through
In this case I agree with Fallon, but she could have said something similar to Krystle in season 1. This is definitely not The Colbys-Fallon anymore.Fallon’s powder room spat with cousin Leslie is strictly verbal, but she nonetheless manages to draw blood with this observation: “Poor Leslie, you have no idea how obvious you are. Look at yourself. You may see Alexis, but everyone else sees a pathetic imitation. You have no identity, Leslie. You’ve tried to take one woman’s style and another woman’s husband and you’ve failed at both
I really liked this accidentally on purpose "attack", it's one of those things you rarely see in soaps.Jill Bennett whacks Paige in the back with the bag in which she had hidden the urn containing Peter’s ashes, which feels all kinds of appropriate.
That's what I meant with great-sad moments, but one time is enough. If it would happen week after week it would diminish the strength of such scenes.save for Laura’s final message to Greg where he talks back to the TV screen, which is so intimate, so personal, it feels almost intrusive to write about it.
It's...I was going to say something like "beyond rock bottom" but even those words wouldn't suffice. Nevertheless, that moment when Melissa thinks she's going to be hit by a train (in her bedroom!) is so-bad-it's-good. And that's better than just bad.Foster Glenn, some sort of pyrotechnic wizard-cum-Vegas illusionist, to gaslight Melissa (who’s already pretty much lit, if you ask me).
Jill Bennett whacks Paige in the back with the bag in which she had hidden the urn containing Peter’s ashes, which feels all kinds of appropriate.
It's...I was going to say something like "beyond rock bottom" but even those words wouldn't suffice. Nevertheless, that moment when Melissa thinks she's going to be hit by a train (in her bedroom!) is so-bad-it's-good. And that's better than just bad.
You may hate Melissa at this point
I think this nonsense (and all that singing stuff) affected Angela's character much worse.
James In London, I love your posts and this thread. I really enjoy how you weave all the shows together and we can see the similarities going on week to week, or how some shows did the same stories in very different ways.
One day, if I were able to find the time, I'd love to do my own personal nerdy viewing of all the shows week to week as you are doing, starting with the first ep of DALLAS and ending with final ep of KNOTS, including DYNASTY and FALCON CREST and COLBYS as they come along.
I'd spice it up by adding TWIN PEAKS in there during the 1989-1990 and 1990-1991 season.
Now I want Alexis to say, "but the Fuentes is mine!"the Fuentes looks more like "art" art while Clayton’s is kind of "soap opera" art

reading a novel by slimy old Jeffrey Archer (come on, Abs — you’re better than that!).
This reeks of desperate improvisation.in spite of a hastily applied piece of tape across the cover of the book in a vain attempt to conceal the author’s name (come on, KNOTS prop department — you’re better than that!)
It's hard to think of Abby as a victim, and it's even harder to think of Abby to think of herself as a victim, let alone to say it.“I was the real victim of your lousy decision,” she cries towards the end of the episode
Valene has been victimized over and over again, but Jill doesn't know everything we know so I can understand her frustration.giving Val the kind of tongue-lashing Sable would have approved of: “You’re the one who keeps this victim routine going, Valene.
I think this is the moment where she gets to the next stage of her character. Her return to the ranch becomes a point of no return. From that point on none of her arguments will carry any validity.By the end of the episode, however, she’s back, suitcase in hand. “I don’t wanna beg,”
Easy for them, without snow.KNOTS is the only soap to acknowledge the Yuletide season
Yes, and I also think that in these kind of stories the disadvantage (being disabled) automatically suggests the opposite.Styles might be played by a minor member of the DALLAS repertory company (he previously appeared in a small role as a retired senator in Season 5), but he exudes a kind of effortlessly sinister authority
Incidentally, the Peyton Place DVD mentions Dallas, Knots Landing and Twin Peaks (but not Dynasty!)and then you could watch TWIN PEAKS: THE RETURN alongside New DYNASTY
in spite of a hastily applied piece of tape across the cover of the book in a vain attempt to conceal the author’s name (come on, KNOTS prop department — you’re better than that!)
Now I want Alexis to say, "but the Fuentes is mine!"
View attachment 10688
I think this is the moment where she gets to the next stage of her character. Her return to the ranch becomes a point of no return. From that point on none of her arguments will carry any validity.
Yes, and I also think that in these kind of stories the disadvantage (being disabled) automatically suggests the opposite.
Soaps like victims, but not when they actually look like victims, it's sort of "not done" (I think).
Incidentally, the Peyton Place DVD mentions Dallas, Knots Landing and Twin Peaks (but not Dynasty!)