Yes, she did, but of course she was lying as usual. I forgot that part.
Did you? Was she? Hmm.
Liam could be right in thinking Max is alive and hiding out somewhere (which would allow Liam to "give back" Fallon's precious legacy to her and the family)...
Remind me, was Fallon looking to retrieve her precious legacy? I wonder why she wanted it sold in the first place, because wondering why she wants it back is one of life’s imponderables.
...faking his death in the middle of a billion-dollar business transaction created instability and/or insecurity among the involved parties, which directly impacted the terms of the sale. A lot of other people involved in the two companies had to sign off on this merger (including government authorities) so he affected many people's personal fortunes by de-stabilizing the situation at such a crucial point.
Presumably, the terms of the sale were already spelt out in the documents Max had to sign so, regardless Max dead or alive, no one’s personal fortune was destabilized (which negated Max’s need to fake his death) – unless….
Unless he never signed, and the sale couldn’t go through and no one benefitted – but that didn’t happen, because
somebody managed to lay their hands on the documents he’d purportedly signed, and the sale went through.
If anything, it would be Max’s faked signature on the S&P that would be the undoing of the sale of CA if found out by the government authorities, not his faked death.
The way I see it, if Max’s only reason to have faked his death was because he wanted to drive down the purchase price of CA to benefit his family – the hoped for scenario being that without Max, the van Kirks wouldn't be so willing to buy CA, making Fallon desperate to sell/find a buyer, and she'd offer to sell to the Van Kirks at a lower price (which they'd accept); and an S&P with terms adjusted to omit Max from the picture would have been signed by Max’s sister and his heir(s) – then, it was a dumb plan: Max wouldn't have benefitted monetarily personally & would have to live as dead to his family. He'd have to assume a different identity. (What are the odds he'd have chosen the name Dick Avery?)
It would be even more complicated
if it turns out that Ada is in cahoots with Max, and they plot to have Fallon murdered in order to "keep Max dead" and keep the Van Kirks in control of C-A. Three guesses who would ordered to kill Fallon...
No three guesses who gave that somebody the only set of documents Max purportedly signed.
And that allowed the sale and purchase of CA to go through
un-renegotiated, so Fallon & Co benefitted from not having to scramble around again to make a fire-sale deal to sell.
OMG! How dumb can you be, Max! Your cahooting with Ada to fake your death just robbed your family the chance to pay less for CA! The only thing you'd get from this is the satisfaction (for whatever reason) of sticking it to your family, your wife.
And, maybe gaining a new life with Ada, and living off cons and card games. Dream on, dude. What goes around, comes around. Just you all wait and see. Ada does what’s best for Ada.
Oh, remind me again, where’s the logic in Fallon wanting to blow the whistle on Max after all that’s happened? Surely, not to get back CA. Where’s the logic in Fallon wanting to prevent the Van Kirks from being in control of CA? Surely, not to get back the company business the majority of the Carrington heirs, herself included, didn’t want anymore.
Actually, when I read that part about the plot to murder Fallon and the reasons for it, my 1st thought was: Why didn't they knock off Liam's wife
before signing the deal, so they'd have an easier time dealing with the rest of the sellers who might be entertaining ambitions about working in CA after the sale, running it from somewhere on-high. My 2nd thought: it wouldn't stop at bumping off just Fallon, because naturally her family wouldn't be taking her murder lying down (unless they were happy to have her death/killing go unchallenged). My 3rd: a string of murders of several of the Carrington clan would be face-saving way to quickly bring nuDynasty to its inglorious end without having to beg for cancellation.
Fallon could also bring up that whole ugly situation with Max demanding she sleep with him to seal the deal, but that would be a harder argument since so much of that would be "he said/she said". But since he'd be a well-established liar by that point, she might get her way on that point, too.
Yes, it would be a pointless argument over what a sleazy dickhead Max was. Also, it would throw a spotlight on the lengths Fallon went to in order to get her own way with Max.
"push the plot along, don't argue the details".
A plus point for throwing logic and common sense outta window: it helps reel in the mindless (‘likes’).